无结构的暴政
The Tyranny of Structurelessness
Jo Freeman · 初版 1972 年
43人推荐
69位读者提及
77次提及
为什么值得读
- 指出不存在真正的无结构，无显性架构必有隐性特权
- 基于早期女权运动亲历经验，反思过于扁平化的恶果
- 篇幅短小精悍，分析发人深省且具备广泛普适性
The Tyranny of Structurelessness 是美国女性主义者 Jo Freeman 撰写的一篇颇具影响力的论文，探讨了激进女性主义集体内部的权力关系。这篇受 Freeman 在 1960 年代妇女解放团体中亲身经历启发的文章，反思了女性主义运动中抵制领导者概念、乃至摒弃任何结构或分工的种种尝试。正如 Hilary Wainwright 在 Z Magazine 中所写，Freeman 阐述了“这种表面上缺乏结构的状况，往往掩盖了一种非正式、未被承认且不受问责的领导权，而这恰恰因为其……而更加有害”。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
关于去中心化任何事物面临的现实底层问题，有一篇经典短文出自 Jo Freeman，叫《无结构之暴政》（the tyranny of structurelessness）[0]。虽然大部分重锤都在文末落下，但读起来既精彩又短小。在文中，她带着前乐观布道者那种清醒的幻灭感，剖析了为什么无结构的组织……
a classic essay discussing the real ground truth problems of decentralized anything is by Jo Freeman, called the tyranny of structurelessness [0]. though most of the punches land toward the end, it is a fascinating and short read, in which she dissects, with the sober disappointment of a former optimistic evangelist, exactly why structureless…
这让我想起 Jo Freeman 写的一篇神作《无结构之暴政》（THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS）。基于她在无组织女权团体里的亲身经历，我觉得她的洞见具有很广的普适性。http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
This reminds me of Jo Freeman's excellent essay, "THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS". Based on her experiences within unstructured feminist organizations, I think her insights are broadly generalizable. http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
……根本不存在所谓的无结构群体。任何性质的群体，只要因为任何目的聚在一起一段时间，都不可避免地会以某种方式构建出自身的结构。——Jo Freeman，《无结构之暴政》http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
…such thing as a structureless group. Any group of people of whatever nature that comes together for any length of time for any purpose will inevitably structure itself in some fashion. --Jo Freeman, "The Tyranny of Structurelessness" http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
> 我发现自己最近贴这篇文的链接有点太频繁了，不过还是再贴一次：Jo Freeman 的《无结构之暴政》。大家都该读读。核心思想就是：在任何系统里，如果你没有显式的层级，那就必定存在隐式的层级。我们几乎彻底抛弃了“建制派”，因为……
> I find myself linking to this article way too much lately, but here it is again: The Tyranny of Structurelessness by Jo Freeman. You should read it. The summary is that in any system, if you don't have an explicit hierarchy, then you have an implicit one. We’ve almost completely discarded “the establishment” because…
关于这个话题的权威之作是 Jo Freeman 的《无结构之暴政》。Freeman 是 70 年代女权运动的成员，她写这篇短文是为了反思“扁平化”到底带来了什么后果——并提出替代方案。简明摘要（tl;dr）的大意可以概括为……
The canonical text on the subject is "The Tyranny of Structurelessness" by Jo Freeman. Freeman was a member of the 70's feminist movement, and wrote this essay to critique how 'flatness' played out - and suggest alternatives. The big, tl;dr idea could be boiled down to…
……在我看来，那个论点里始终昭然若揭的一点是：永远存在一个隐式流程，而这个流程通常对当前的“掌权者”最为有利。Jo Freeman 有篇短文叫《无结构之暴政》，重点剖析了这个问题（缺乏显式流程）在 20 世纪 70 年代左翼政治运动中的表现，她极好地解释了缺乏显式流程是如何让那些……
…me that was always shining through that argument was that there is always an implicit process and that process is usually ideal for the current people "in power"." Jo Freeman has an essay called "The Tyranny of Structurelessness" which focused on how this issue (lack of explicit process) played out in left-wing political movements in the 1970s, and she does a great job of explaining how the lack of explicit process allows those…