《资本已死》封面

资本已死

Capital is Dead

McKenzie Wark · 初版 2019 年

2位读者提及
2次提及

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • ……并不等同于对信息载体(vectors)的掌控,而掌控这些载体的人对那些能掌控自身生产却无法掌控分发渠道的人握有极大的权力;参见麦肯齐·沃克(McKenzie Wark)的《资本已死:情况是否变得更糟?》(Capital is Dead: Is This Something Worse?)。左翼传统上一直聚焦于阶级,因为马克思主义通过唯物主义强力论证了阶级是不平等的关键纽带。但如果你运用同样的唯物主义分析法……

    …not identical to control over information vectors, and owners of those vectors exercise great power over people who can control their own production but not the distribution of it; see McKenzie Wark's Capital is Dead: Is This Something Worse? The left is traditionally focused on class because Marxism, via materialism, made strong arguments this was the lynchpin of inequity. But if you run that same materialist analysis…

  • 《资本已死:情况是否变得更糟?》(Capital Is Dead: Is This Something Worse?)——麦肯齐·沃克(McKenzie Wark) »麦肯齐·沃克认为,在我们的网络化社会中,无所不在的数据催生了一种全新的生产方式,这种生产方式不再由资本家统治……

    Capital Is Dead: Is This Something Worse? — Mckenzie Wark »McKenzie Wark argues that the all-pervasive presence of data in our networked society has given rise to a new mode of production, one not ruled over by capitalists…

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助