任何觉得这个故事耐人寻味的人，都应该马上去买 Charles Eisenstein 写的《Climate: A New Story》。他探讨了我们在讨论环境问题时是如何使用“战争用语”的，以及这又是如何削弱我们的努力的……接着他提出了我们如何跳出这种思维定势的对话窠臼，……
Anyone who found this story intriguing should immediately go buy "Climate: A New Story" by Charles Eisenstein. He explores how we use "war language" when talking about environmental issues and how that undercuts our efforts... then he proposes how we get out of that conversational rut,…
我想在这里给所有感到恐慌、并对身边竟然没人足够恐慌而感到愤怒的人推荐一本书。《Climate - A New Story》，作者 Charles Eisenstein。作者提出，我们的因果关系可能搞反了。并不是因为气候恶化导致万物凋零——而是因为气候恶化是由于……
I want to drop a book recommendation in here for everyone else that feels panicked and mad that no one around them is panicking enough. Climate - A New Story by Charles Eisenstein The author suggests that we might have the causation backwards. It's not that everything is dying because the climate is getting worse -- it's that the climate's getting worse because…
……但另一方面，大气和海洋储存更多能量严格来说并不是造成我们问题的元凶，真正的问题在于天气的极端性和不可预测性。Charles Eisenstein 的书《Climate - a new story》说服了我，生物量和大型健康生态系统对天气起到了缓冲作用，森林会改变周围的大气并带来降雨，这其中包含各种复杂的相互作用，而我们却把……
…But on the other hand, the atmosphere and oceans storing more energy is not strictly what's causing our problems, but rather the severity and unpredictability of the weather. Charles Eisenstein's book "Climate - a new story" convinced me that biomass and large healthy ecosystems act as a buffer on weather, that forests change the atmosphere around them and attract rain fall, all kinds of complex interactions that we've taken…
……草地储存了数百吉吨的碳。不能仅仅是种树，而是必须培育丰富的生态系统：生物种类越多越好。我已经被 Charles Eisenstein 的《Climate: a new story》彻底说服了——他提出了强有力的论点，认为我们之所以只对碳念念不忘，是因为我们没有好的方法去衡量其他任何东西；虽然温室效应当然是真实存在的，但负面影响……
…grasslands store hundreds of gigatons of carbon. It can't just be planting trees, it has to be cultivating rich ecosystems: the more living things the better. I've been converted by Charles Eisenstein's book "Climate: a new story" - he makes a strong case that we're only obsessed with carbon because we don't have good ways of measuring anything else, and that while of course the greenhouse effect is real, the negative effects…
……作为一个缓冲带来储存能量、碳和水——地球上的生命越多，大气就越稳定。（我不是气候科学家，这是我读了 Charles Eisenstein 的《Climate: a New Story》后的感受，它彻底改变了我对气候变化的悲观宿命论态度）
…as a buffer for storing energy, carbon, and water - the more life on earth, the more stable the atmosphere becomes. (I'm no climate scientist, this is my impression from reading Charles Eisenstein's Climate: a New Story, totally turned me around on being fatalistic about climate change)
……老实说我也同意。你可以花几千美元或者做几千小时的志愿服务，但决定几万亿美元怎么花的是政客。除此之外，我可以推荐 Charles Eisenstein 的《Climate - a new story》，它反对将注意力只集中在 CO2 ppm 这一单一指标上（顺便还提到了当我们决定跟某事抗争时默认采用的战争类比 ;)）。基本上它认为我们……
…honestly I agree. You can spend thousands of dollars or thousands of hours of volunteering, but its the politicians that are deciding how to spend trillions. Outside of that, I can recommend the book "Climate - a new story" by Charles Eisenstein, it argues against focusing on a single metric of CO2 ppm (and includes an aside on the war-analogy we default to when we decide to fight something ;). Basically it suggests we…
任何觉得这个故事耐人寻味的人，都应该马上去买 Charles Eisenstein 写的《Climate: A New Story》。他探讨了我们在讨论环境问题时是如何使用“战争用语”的，以及这又是如何削弱我们的努力的……接着他提出了我们如何跳出这种思维定势的对话窠臼，……
Anyone who found this story intriguing should immediately go buy "Climate: A New Story" by Charles Eisenstein. He explores how we use "war language" when talking about environmental issues and how that undercuts our efforts... then he proposes how we get out of that conversational rut,…
我想在这里给所有感到恐慌、并对身边竟然没人足够恐慌而感到愤怒的人推荐一本书。《Climate - A New Story》，作者 Charles Eisenstein。作者提出，我们的因果关系可能搞反了。并不是因为气候恶化导致万物凋零——而是因为气候恶化是由于……
I want to drop a book recommendation in here for everyone else that feels panicked and mad that no one around them is panicking enough. Climate - A New Story by Charles Eisenstein The author suggests that we might have the causation backwards. It's not that everything is dying because the climate is getting worse -- it's that the climate's getting worse because…
……但另一方面，大气和海洋储存更多能量严格来说并不是造成我们问题的元凶，真正的问题在于天气的极端性和不可预测性。Charles Eisenstein 的书《Climate - a new story》说服了我，生物量和大型健康生态系统对天气起到了缓冲作用，森林会改变周围的大气并带来降雨，这其中包含各种复杂的相互作用，而我们却把……
…But on the other hand, the atmosphere and oceans storing more energy is not strictly what's causing our problems, but rather the severity and unpredictability of the weather. Charles Eisenstein's book "Climate - a new story" convinced me that biomass and large healthy ecosystems act as a buffer on weather, that forests change the atmosphere around them and attract rain fall, all kinds of complex interactions that we've taken…
……草地储存了数百吉吨的碳。不能仅仅是种树，而是必须培育丰富的生态系统：生物种类越多越好。我已经被 Charles Eisenstein 的《Climate: a new story》彻底说服了——他提出了强有力的论点，认为我们之所以只对碳念念不忘，是因为我们没有好的方法去衡量其他任何东西；虽然温室效应当然是真实存在的，但负面影响……
…grasslands store hundreds of gigatons of carbon. It can't just be planting trees, it has to be cultivating rich ecosystems: the more living things the better. I've been converted by Charles Eisenstein's book "Climate: a new story" - he makes a strong case that we're only obsessed with carbon because we don't have good ways of measuring anything else, and that while of course the greenhouse effect is real, the negative effects…
……作为一个缓冲带来储存能量、碳和水——地球上的生命越多，大气就越稳定。（我不是气候科学家，这是我读了 Charles Eisenstein 的《Climate: a New Story》后的感受，它彻底改变了我对气候变化的悲观宿命论态度）
…as a buffer for storing energy, carbon, and water - the more life on earth, the more stable the atmosphere becomes. (I'm no climate scientist, this is my impression from reading Charles Eisenstein's Climate: a New Story, totally turned me around on being fatalistic about climate change)
……老实说我也同意。你可以花几千美元或者做几千小时的志愿服务，但决定几万亿美元怎么花的是政客。除此之外，我可以推荐 Charles Eisenstein 的《Climate - a new story》，它反对将注意力只集中在 CO2 ppm 这一单一指标上（顺便还提到了当我们决定跟某事抗争时默认采用的战争类比 ;)）。基本上它认为我们……
…honestly I agree. You can spend thousands of dollars or thousands of hours of volunteering, but its the politicians that are deciding how to spend trillions. Outside of that, I can recommend the book "Climate - a new story" by Charles Eisenstein, it argues against focusing on a single metric of CO2 ppm (and includes an aside on the war-analogy we default to when we decide to fight something ;). Basically it suggests we…