……遍。轻松好读。- William R. Forstchen 写的《One Second After》（一秒之后）。虽然我对书里的一些设定有点小意见，但这是一本挺有意思的末日废土（post-apoc）小说。- Derek Sivers 的任何书。他文笔精炼。- Jack Carr 写的《The Terminal List》（终极名单）。相当不错，虽然不如 Dalton Fury，但我会继续读该系列的下一本。- 一堆技术书。我对读什么小说非常挑剔，但很乐意接受大家随手安利。……
…times. Easy reads. - One Second After by William R. Forstchen. Although I have some minor issues with things in it, it's a fun post-apoc book. - Anything by Derek Sivers. His writing is concise. - The Terminal List by Jack Carr. Pretty good, not quite as good as Dalton Fury, but will read the next in the series. - Bunches of tech books I am very picky about the fiction I'll read but am open to unsolicited suggestions.…
……近几年（5年）能想起来的时间里，那些公司就没出过什么高质量作品，所以大家正在克服几十年的惯性去寻找新的 IP（properties）。不过，看看《侠探杰克》（Reacher）和《终极名单》（Terminal List）相比《时光之轮》（Wheel of Time）和《力量之戒》（Rings of Power）的不同口碑，你就能明白把政治说教（The Message）置于质量之上是行不通的。> Google 搜了一下，那个 Rippaverse 似乎就是一种完全反向的极端反弹，……
…Those companies haven’t produced quality within easy memory (5 years) and so people are overcoming their decades of inertia to find new properties. You can look at the different receptions of Reacher and Terminal List versus Wheel of Time and Rings of Power, though, to see that putting The Message over quality doesn’t work. > After Googling a bit, that Rippaverse thing seems like it's an opposite-polarity reaction,…
……遍。轻松好读。- William R. Forstchen 写的《One Second After》（一秒之后）。虽然我对书里的一些设定有点小意见，但这是一本挺有意思的末日废土（post-apoc）小说。- Derek Sivers 的任何书。他文笔精炼。- Jack Carr 写的《The Terminal List》（终极名单）。相当不错，虽然不如 Dalton Fury，但我会继续读该系列的下一本。- 一堆技术书。我对读什么小说非常挑剔，但很乐意接受大家随手安利。……
…times. Easy reads. - One Second After by William R. Forstchen. Although I have some minor issues with things in it, it's a fun post-apoc book. - Anything by Derek Sivers. His writing is concise. - The Terminal List by Jack Carr. Pretty good, not quite as good as Dalton Fury, but will read the next in the series. - Bunches of tech books I am very picky about the fiction I'll read but am open to unsolicited suggestions.…
……近几年（5年）能想起来的时间里，那些公司就没出过什么高质量作品，所以大家正在克服几十年的惯性去寻找新的 IP（properties）。不过，看看《侠探杰克》（Reacher）和《终极名单》（Terminal List）相比《时光之轮》（Wheel of Time）和《力量之戒》（Rings of Power）的不同口碑，你就能明白把政治说教（The Message）置于质量之上是行不通的。> Google 搜了一下，那个 Rippaverse 似乎就是一种完全反向的极端反弹，……
…Those companies haven’t produced quality within easy memory (5 years) and so people are overcoming their decades of inertia to find new properties. You can look at the different receptions of Reacher and Terminal List versus Wheel of Time and Rings of Power, though, to see that putting The Message over quality doesn’t work. > After Googling a bit, that Rippaverse thing seems like it's an opposite-polarity reaction,…