人类理解研究

Hacker News 上怎么说

• mbateman · 2010 年

  ……《沉思录》或柏拉图的《理想国》。阿佛洛狄西亚的亚历山大的《论命运》+ 麦基的《来自洛克的哲学问题》；斯宾诺莎的《神学政治论》+ 斯图尔特的《廷臣与异端》（关于斯宾诺莎和莱布尼茨）；休谟的《人类理解研究》；康德的《道德形而上学奠基》；康德的《未来形而上学导论》；密尔的《论自由》；安斯康姆的“现代道德哲学”；兰德的“什么是资本主义？”；斯特劳森的《感觉的界限》……

  …Meditations or Plato's Republic. On Fate, Alexander of Aphrodisias + Problems from Locke, Mackie Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, Spinoza + The Courtier and the Heretic, Stewart (on Spinoza and Leibniz) Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, Kant On Liberty, Mill "Modern Moral Philosophy", Anscombe "What is Capitalism?", Rand The Bounds of Sense,…

• telemachos · 2010 年

  ……《第一哲学沉思集》（剑桥大学出版社那一版非常好；买他们出的《笛卡尔哲学著作选》打基础大概也很值）；大卫·休谟的《人类理解研究》和《道德原理研究》（推荐 Oxford Philosophical Texts 版）；维特根斯坦的《哲学研究》（极其极其难读，但收获非常大）……

  …Meditations on First Philosophy (The Cambridge University Press edition is very good; it's probably worth buying their Selected Philosophical Writings for a good basic Descartes text) David Hume: An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding and An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals (I recommend the Oxford Philosophical Texts editions) Wittgenstein: Philosophical Investigations (terribly, terribly difficult, but very rewarding)…

• bobcostas55 · 2015 年

  ……故意这么做，或者在根本没必要的地方造出一大堆术语。但有大批作者——尤其是在“分析哲学”传统下的——写得非常清晰简练。可以读读休谟（《人类理解研究》——篇幅短且震撼力极强）、罗素、卢梭、塞尔、普特南或丹尼特。

  …intentionally, or invent myriads of terms where it isn't really necessary. But there are plenty of writers, particularly in the "analytic" tradition, who write very clearly and succinctly. Try Hume (An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding -- short and high-impact), Russell, Rousseau, Searle, Putnam, or Dennett.

• ola · 2015 年

  大卫·休谟《人类理解研究》里我最喜欢的一段：“我身在何处，或者我到底算什么？我的存在源自什么因果，我又将归于何种境地？……我被所有这些问题搞得晕头转向，开始觉得自己陷入了最可悲的……

  My favorite passage from David Hume's work `An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding` “Where am I, or what? From what causes do I derive my existence, and to what condition shall I return? ... I am confounded with all these questions, and begin to fancy myself in the most deplorable…

• hyperpape · 2017 年

  ……《沉思录》非常抓人，尤其是他提出知识是否能有坚实基础这个问题的方式，以及随之而来的怀疑主义担忧（虽然他的解法有点让人失望）。休谟的《人类理解研究》也很棒。如果你对自由意志感兴趣，凯恩的《当代自由意志导论》很扎实——我当年给教授当助教（TA）时，他指定的就是这本教材。

  …Meditations gripping for the way he poses the question of whether there can be any solid foundation for knowledge and the resulting skeptical worries (though his solution is somewhat disappointing). Hume's Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding is also wonderful. If you find free will interesting, Kane's "A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will" is solid--it was the text a professor assigned when I ta'd for his course.

• amortize · 2019 年

  虽然读休谟之前我也有过类似的顾虑，但我发现他的文笔其实挺平易近人的。关于《人类理解研究》，我觉得乔纳森·贝内特（Jonathan Bennett）对某些词句做了解释的这个版本非常有用：https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/hume1748.pdf

  Although I had similar apprehensions before I started reading Hume, I have found his writing approachable. For "Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding", I found this edition with explanations of certain words/phrases by Jonathan Bennett very useful: https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/hume1748.pdf

正在加载完整评论……