
工作场所的民主
Democracy at work
Richard D. Wolff · 初版 2012 年
8人推荐
13位读者提及
25次提及
为什么值得读
- 深入阐述合作社制与工作场所民主的价值
- 为替代传统资本主义模式提供理论辩护
- 剖析劳动者直接掌控企业运营的现实基础
Wolff 阐述了让民主化工作场所成真的缘由与途径。他面向的是那些认识到资本主义经济与常规政治已变得不可容忍、并正在寻求具体行动方案的人群。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……

Democracy at work
Richard D. Wolff · 初版 2012 年
Wolff 阐述了让民主化工作场所成真的缘由与途径。他面向的是那些认识到资本主义经济与常规政治已变得不可容忍、并正在寻求具体行动方案的人群。
正在加载完整评论……
直接把那该死的敌人点名道姓说出来吧。以 'C' 开头,以 'apitalism' 结尾。去读读 Richard Wolff 的《Democracy at Work》。This is the way。
Name the fucking enemy. Starts with a 'C' and ends in 'apitalism'. Read Richard Wolff's Democracy at Work. This is the way.
…问题,但我觉得这是一个非常值得去实现的目标,我们应该努力去搞清楚怎么做。[1] 想了解更多关于基于合作社商业模式的经济效益的信息,可以参考 Richard Wolff 写的那本好书《Democracy at Work》:http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13591849-democracy-at-wor...
…problems, but I think it's a goal so worth achieving that we ought to work hard to figure that out. [1] For more information on the benefits of a cooperative-business based economy, see the excellent book "Democracy at Work" By Richard Wolff: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13591849-democracy-at-wor...
…由脱离商店日常管理和运营的董事会来打理。相反,在里面工作的人民主地管理工作场所(读一读 Richard Wolff 的《Democracy at Work》,里面很好地论证了为什么这种制度既可行又公正——像这样的成功机构有成百上千家,感兴趣的话可以去 Wikipedia 查查 Mondragon)。民主能防止垄断所有权…
…be run by a board of directors that is divorced from the day to day management and running of the store. Instead the same people that work there, democratically run the workplace (read Richard Wolff’s Democracy at Work for a good defense of why this system is both viable and just – there are hundreds of successful institutions like this, Wikipedia Mondragon if you’re interested). Democracy prevents monopoly ownership…
感谢分享!我想搞一个自己的机器人合作社(robotics coop),这内容看着挺有帮助的。你读过 Richard Wolff 的书《Democracy at Work》吗,或者你熟悉 Richard Wolff 吗?他是一位马克思主义经济学家,主张推动社会转型为像你这种由工人主导的商业模式。:)
Thank you for sharing! I want to start my own robotics coop and this looks helpful. Have you read Richard Wolff's book "Democracy at Work", or are you familiar with Richard Wolff? He's a Marxist economist that advocates for transitioning society to a worker directed business model like yours. :)
两大原因。#1 劳动力充沛,意味着是买方市场,所以开发者没有议价筹码(leverage)。关于这个话题有一本很不错的入门书:《Democracy At Work》 https://www.amazon.com/Democracy-at-Work-Cure-Capitalism/dp/... #2 我已经是彻头彻尾的 pinko commie liberal socialist 了,但我都无法想象哪怕是出于最善意(最少 alt-factual neo-reactionary…
Two big reasons. #1 Abundant labor, meaning buyers market, so developers don't have leverage. This has a pretty good primer on the topic: Democracy At Work https://www.amazon.com/Democracy-at-Work-Cure-Capitalism/dp/... #2 I'm as pinko commie liberal socialist as they come, and I can't imagine how even the most well intentioned (least alt-factual neo-reactionary…
…那帮人(这本身就是个矛盾,anarchy 意味着缺乏控制系统或政府,而 capitalism 是一种权力结构),而且还很粉 Molyneux。我一直以来都更喜欢 Richard Wolff 和他的项目《Democracy at Work》。[0] 但哪怕是比 Wolff 博士(耶鲁、哈佛、斯坦福背景)学术严肃度更低一些的知识分子,比如 Zeitgeist Project 的 Peter Joseph,都让 Stefan 显得像个小丑了。[1] 而一个比 Peter 还更不严肃的知识分子…
…guys (which is a contradiction, anarchy means lack of a control system or gov't, and capitalism is a power structure) and loved Molyneux. I've always been more of a fan of Richard Wolff and his project, Democracy at Work.[0] But a less serious intellectual than Dr. Wolff (of Yale, Harvard, Stanford), Peter Joseph of the Zeitgeist Project has made Stefan look foolish.[1] And an even less serious intellectual than Peter…