关于亚里士多德形而上学与现代世界的另一本好书是 Edward Feser 的《亚里士多德的复仇：物理和生物科学的形而上学基础》：> 现实性与潜在性、实体形式与原初物质、有效因果性与目的论，都是其基本概念……
Another good book on Aristotle's metaphysics and the modern world is Edward Feser's Aristotle’s Revenge: The Metaphysical Foundations of Physical and Biological Science: > Actuality and potentiality, substantial form and prime matter, efficient causality and teleology are among the fundamental concepts…
我刚才忘了提这方面近期一本很棒的英文资源，就是 Ed Feser 的《不朽的灵魂》（Immortal Souls）[0]。如果想了解更广阔的科学哲学背景，他近期的《亚里士多德的复仇》（Aristotle's Revenge）[1] 会是一本很好的配套读物。[0] https://a.co/d/03xoxiaY [1] https://a.co/d/00oSQ64j
I failed to mention a great recent English language resource on the topic, namely, Ed Feser's "Immortal Souls" [0]. For broader philosophy of science context, his recent "Aristotle's Revenge" [1] will serve as a good companion read. [0] https://a.co/d/03xoxiaY [1] https://a.co/d/00oSQ64j
…Bacon. Some would disagree: > Actuality and potentiality, substantial form and prime matter, efficient causality and teleology are among the fundamental concepts of Aristotelian philosophy of nature. Aristotle's Revenge argues that these concepts are not only compatible with modern science, but are implicitly presupposed by modern science. * https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/43277412-aristotle-s-rev...
至于量子特性，或许可以看看《因果性与放射性衰变》（Causality and radioactive decay）：* https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2014/12/causality-and-radio... 翻看目录，《亚里士多德的复仇》这本书里也有“§5.2 亚里士多德与量子力学”（我读这本书已经是好几年前的事了）：* https://www.editiones-scholasticae.de/artikel/aristotles-rev... * https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/43277412
For quantum-ness, see perhaps "Causality and radioactive decay": * https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2014/12/causality-and-radio... The book Aristotle's Revenge has "§5.2 Aristotle and quantum mechanics" as well per the table of contents (been a few years since I read it): * https://www.editiones-scholasticae.de/artikel/aristotles-rev... * https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/43277412
……正如 James Ladyman 和 Don Ross 在其著作《一切都得去：自然化形而上学》（Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized）以及物理学家 Max Tegmark 所主张的那样。在即将出版的《亚里士多德的复仇》[1] 中，我对 Ladyman 和 Ross 的方案有很多探讨，基本全是批判性的。就目前而言，指出这种观点本质上是将物理世界等同于某种柏拉图式的抽象客体就足够了。Ladyman 和 Ross 试图处理……
…as James Ladyman and Don Ross in their book 'Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized', and by the physicist Max Tegmark. I have a lot to say about Ladyman and Ross’s project in the forthcoming 'Aristotle’s Revenge'[1], all of it critical. Suffice it for present purposes to note that this sort of view essentially identifies the physical world with a kind of Platonic abstract object. Ladyman and Ross try to deal…
强烈推荐文里提到的 Feser 写的《亚里士多德的复仇》（Aristotle's Revenge）。把那种泛滥的唯物主义态度拆解得相当彻底。
I highly recommend Feser's Aristotle's Revenge that's mentioned in the article. Very much dismantles the pervasive materialist attitude.
关于亚里士多德形而上学与现代世界的另一本好书是 Edward Feser 的《亚里士多德的复仇：物理和生物科学的形而上学基础》：> 现实性与潜在性、实体形式与原初物质、有效因果性与目的论，都是其基本概念……
Another good book on Aristotle's metaphysics and the modern world is Edward Feser's Aristotle’s Revenge: The Metaphysical Foundations of Physical and Biological Science: > Actuality and potentiality, substantial form and prime matter, efficient causality and teleology are among the fundamental concepts…
我刚才忘了提这方面近期一本很棒的英文资源，就是 Ed Feser 的《不朽的灵魂》（Immortal Souls）[0]。如果想了解更广阔的科学哲学背景，他近期的《亚里士多德的复仇》（Aristotle's Revenge）[1] 会是一本很好的配套读物。[0] https://a.co/d/03xoxiaY [1] https://a.co/d/00oSQ64j
I failed to mention a great recent English language resource on the topic, namely, Ed Feser's "Immortal Souls" [0]. For broader philosophy of science context, his recent "Aristotle's Revenge" [1] will serve as a good companion read. [0] https://a.co/d/03xoxiaY [1] https://a.co/d/00oSQ64j
……培根。有人可能不同意：> 现实性与潜在性、实体形式与原初物质、有效因果性与目的论，都是亚里士多德自然哲学的基本概念。《亚里士多德的复仇》认为，这些概念不仅与现代科学兼容，而且是现代科学暗中默认的前提。* https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/43277412-aristotle-s-rev...
…Bacon. Some would disagree: > Actuality and potentiality, substantial form and prime matter, efficient causality and teleology are among the fundamental concepts of Aristotelian philosophy of nature. Aristotle's Revenge argues that these concepts are not only compatible with modern science, but are implicitly presupposed by modern science. * https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/43277412-aristotle-s-rev...
至于量子特性，或许可以看看《因果性与放射性衰变》（Causality and radioactive decay）：* https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2014/12/causality-and-radio... 翻看目录，《亚里士多德的复仇》这本书里也有“§5.2 亚里士多德与量子力学”（我读这本书已经是好几年前的事了）：* https://www.editiones-scholasticae.de/artikel/aristotles-rev... * https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/43277412
For quantum-ness, see perhaps "Causality and radioactive decay": * https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2014/12/causality-and-radio... The book Aristotle's Revenge has "§5.2 Aristotle and quantum mechanics" as well per the table of contents (been a few years since I read it): * https://www.editiones-scholasticae.de/artikel/aristotles-rev... * https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/43277412
……正如 James Ladyman 和 Don Ross 在其著作《一切都得去：自然化形而上学》（Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized）以及物理学家 Max Tegmark 所主张的那样。在即将出版的《亚里士多德的复仇》[1] 中，我对 Ladyman 和 Ross 的方案有很多探讨，基本全是批判性的。就目前而言，指出这种观点本质上是将物理世界等同于某种柏拉图式的抽象客体就足够了。Ladyman 和 Ross 试图处理……
…as James Ladyman and Don Ross in their book 'Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized', and by the physicist Max Tegmark. I have a lot to say about Ladyman and Ross’s project in the forthcoming 'Aristotle’s Revenge'[1], all of it critical. Suffice it for present purposes to note that this sort of view essentially identifies the physical world with a kind of Platonic abstract object. Ladyman and Ross try to deal…