失配
Mismatch
Richard Sander、Stuart Taylor Jr. · 初版 2012 年
1人推荐
2位读者提及
3次提及
本书指出 affirmative action 实际上损害了少数族裔学生的利益，并且这场始于1960年代末的运动只是一种象征性的变革，如今已深陷装模作样、掩盖真相以及政治分肥（pork-barrel earmarks）的泥潭之中。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
Mismatch
Richard Sander、Stuart Taylor Jr. · 初版 2012 年
本书指出 affirmative action 实际上损害了少数族裔学生的利益，并且这场始于1960年代末的运动只是一种象征性的变革，如今已深陷装模作样、掩盖真相以及政治分肥（pork-barrel earmarks）的泥潭之中。
正在加载完整评论……
……这种假设已经被研究过了。证据表明，进入一所你自身准备不足的学校，其结果比进入一所差一点但你准备充分的学校还要糟糕。如果你想了解相关证据，可以读读 http://www.amazon.com/Mismatch-Affirmative-Students-Intended... 。我个人的疑问在于，如果让准备不足的高能力学生进入好学校，并且提供充分的协助……
…assumption has been studied. Evidence says that getting into a school you are not prepared for results in worse outcomes than getting into a worse school that you are prepared for. Read http://www.amazon.com/Mismatch-Affirmative-Students-Intended... if you want to see some of that evidence. The question that I have is whether getting underprepared by highly able students into a good school AND giving sufficient assistance…
……任何想带来实质改变的人都必须正视的表态。而且敷衍淡化不平等造成的影响在两边都存在。推荐一本发人深省的书：http://www.amazon.com/Mismatch-Affirmative-Students-Intended... ，该书论证了仅仅让弱势群体直接获得与优势群体相同的教育机会，实际上反而是害了他们。……
…statement that has to be addressed by anyone who wants to create actual change. And hand-waving away the effects of inequality goes both ways. For a thought-provoking book, read http://www.amazon.com/Mismatch-Affirmative-Students-Intended... which demonstrates that simply giving disadvantaged people direct access to the same educational opportunities that advantaged people could have actually does them a disservice.…
……弄得好像他们必须为自己的存在进行辩护一样。”我认为这是不对的。迎合边缘化群体并不会让他们减少被边缘化的程度。事实上，这反而会让情况恶化：http://www.amazon.com/Mismatch-Affirmative-Students-Intended... 我认为应该坚持某些重要的评估标准，而不是一刀切地直接禁止。这是基础心理学的道理——提供积极的……
…like they have to defend their presence." I believe this is wrong. Catering to marginalized people do not make those people less marginalized. In fact, it can make situation worse: http://www.amazon.com/Mismatch-Affirmative-Students-Intended... I think that one should provide insistence on some important criteria evaluation instead of banning something outright. This is from basic psychology - provide positive…