为了公平而评分
Grading for Equity
Joe Feldman · 初版 2018 年
2位读者提及
3次提及
“一段时间以来，传统的（A至F）评分做法受到了来自各利益相关方的抨击。各班级之间的评分标准极不一致，常常具有误导性、缺乏依据，并且往往建立在主观判断之上。更令人担忧的是，我们的评分做法加剧了学业成绩差距。众所周知，非裔和拉丁裔学生、男生以及特殊教育学生被停学和开除的比例严重失衡，这受到了教师对学生行为潜意识中的偏见判断的影响。而几乎被彻底忽视的是，教师的评分方式
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
《公平评分》（Grading for Equity）的作者曾来我们学校演讲，那次经历挺有意思：人文学院的教职工一直试图把对话往传统上与“公平”挂钩的话题引，比如系统性种族主义，……
The authors of Grading for Equity spoke at my school and the experience was an interesting one: the Humanities faculty constantly tried to move the conversation toward the topics traditionally associated with "equity": systemic racism,…
有些系统根本不提供其他选项，或者把替换默认设置搞得极其麻烦。我使用的评分方案更接近作者提出的方案（虽然在《公平评分》写出来好些年前，我就已经在用自己这套系统了），想让 Canvas 按我的意向来简直是一场无休止的折磨。我基本上得在线下用电子表格搞定所有的评分，然后直接上传到 Canvas 的成绩册里。（即便这样，它也……
Some systems don't provide any other option, or make it very difficult to replace the default. I use a grading scheme closer to what the authors propose (although I was using my own system years before Grading for Equity was written) and it's a constant struggle to make Canvas do what I want. I basically have to do all my grading in a spreadsheet offline, and then just upload it into the Canvas gradebook. (Even then it…
我老婆是个高中老师。这是她对我们当下做法的主要抱怨。她经常聊起《公平评分》这本书。我个人觉得传统学校教育有点像个僵尸。一个惯性如此之大的体制，根本不可能跟上一个动辄推出通用搜索和聊天功能的世界……
SO is a high school teacher. This is her primary complaint about how we do things today. She talks a lot about the book Grading for Equity. I'm of the opinion that traditional schooling is a bit of a zombie. There just isn't a way for an institution with that much inertia to keep up with a world that releases generalized search and chat-capable…