容我提一下我写的书（《Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Science Wars》，Mayo 著，剑桥大学出版社）。https://twitter.com/learnfromerror/status/107197020637171302... 我之前不知道 Hacker News，刚才只是想查查为什么我的博客 errorstatstics.com 会收到……
Might I mention my book (Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Science Wars (Mayo CUP)). https://twitter.com/learnfromerror/status/107197020637171302... I did not know of Hacker news but was trying to trace why my blog errorstatstics.com got…
感谢推荐 Mayo 的书。我目前正在啃她的《Statistical Inference as Severe Testing》，感觉非常累人。到目前为止，书里几乎没怎么讲真正的统计学和争议的实质核心，反而净扯些元问题（meta questions）以及各执一词的口水仗。也许她之前那本《Error……
Thanks for the Mayo recommendation. I am currently going through her Statistical Inference as Severe Testing, and find it very tiring. So far very little is about actual statistics and the meat of disputes, but rather about meta questions and the he-said, she-said of those disputes. Maybe the prior book Error…
……用来区分证实（corroboration）和归纳（induction），因为后者在当时正被使用。正是同样的动力驱使内曼（Neyman）将推断称为一种（推断的）行为。我在新书《Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars》（Mayo 2018，剑桥大学出版社）中解释了这一切。正如我在书中所言：“在我看来，界定什么推断是有依据的、什么是无根据的——即规范认识论——并不是单纯使用概率的问题……
…to distinguish corroboration from induction, as the latter was being used at the time. The same impetus led Neyman to speak of inference as an act (of inferring). I explain all this in my recent book, Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars (Mayo 2018,CUP. As I say there, “In my view an account of what is warranted and unwarranted to infer – a normative epistemology – is not a matter of using probability…
容我提一下我写的书（《Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Science Wars》，Mayo 著，剑桥大学出版社）。https://twitter.com/learnfromerror/status/107197020637171302... 我之前不知道 Hacker News，刚才只是想查查为什么我的博客 errorstatstics.com 会收到……
Might I mention my book (Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Science Wars (Mayo CUP)). https://twitter.com/learnfromerror/status/107197020637171302... I did not know of Hacker news but was trying to trace why my blog errorstatstics.com got…
Deborah Mayo 写的《Statistical Inference as Severe Testing》这本书或许挺合适。
A book by Deborah Mayo "Statistical Inference as Severe Testing" might fit.
感谢推荐 Mayo 的书。我目前正在啃她的《Statistical Inference as Severe Testing》，感觉非常累人。到目前为止，书里几乎没怎么讲真正的统计学和争议的实质核心，反而净扯些元问题（meta questions）以及各执一词的口水仗。也许她之前那本《Error……
Thanks for the Mayo recommendation. I am currently going through her Statistical Inference as Severe Testing, and find it very tiring. So far very little is about actual statistics and the meat of disputes, but rather about meta questions and the he-said, she-said of those disputes. Maybe the prior book Error…
……用来区分证实（corroboration）和归纳（induction），因为后者在当时正被使用。正是同样的动力驱使内曼（Neyman）将推断称为一种（推断的）行为。我在新书《Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars》（Mayo 2018，剑桥大学出版社）中解释了这一切。正如我在书中所言：“在我看来，界定什么推断是有依据的、什么是无根据的——即规范认识论——并不是单纯使用概率的问题……
…to distinguish corroboration from induction, as the latter was being used at the time. The same impetus led Neyman to speak of inference as an act (of inferring). I explain all this in my recent book, Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars (Mayo 2018,CUP. As I say there, “In my view an account of what is warranted and unwarranted to infer – a normative epistemology – is not a matter of using probability…