经济与社会
Economy and Society
Max Weber · 初版 1978 年
1人推荐
2位读者提及
15次提及
《An Outline of Interpretive Sociology》是政治经济学家兼社会学家 Max Weber 的一部著作，在其去世后由其妻子 Marianne 在德国出版。它与《The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism》并列，被公认为是 Weber 最重要的代表作之一
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……手握暴力机器的人制定规则。这就是老生常谈的“合法暴力垄断”。可惜马克斯·韦伯在公众讨论中的热度远没有达到他应有的水平，他在《经济与社会》里把太多事情“猜”得精准得可怕。在我看来，这本书才是定义我们现代社会的奠基之作，马克思的《资本论》充其量只能屈居第二。
…the men to use them makes the rules. The good old monopoly of violence. Too bad Max Weber is not in the public discussion as much as he should be, he “guessed” a lot of things too damned right in his “Economy and Society”, imho it is the defining book of our modern society, with Marx’s “Capital” a close second.
……在世界上时不时出现，甚至现在也是。国家的诉求在于其合法性。肆意妄为的行使权力等于放弃合法性。引自韦伯，马克斯 (1978). 罗斯, 冈瑟; 维蒂希, 克劳斯 (编). 《经济与社会》. 伯克利: 加州大学出版社. 第 54 页. <https://archive.org/details/economysociety00webe/page/54/mod...> 而“暴力垄断”或“武力垄断”这种简称则是近得多的产物，……
…from time to time in the world, and even now. The state's claim is to legitimacy. A capricious exercise would be an abrogation of legitimacy Weber, Max (1978). Roth, Guenther; Wittich, Claus (eds.). Economy and Society. Berkeley: U. California Press. p. 54. <https://archive.org/details/economysociety00webe/page/54/mod...> The "monopoly on violence" or "monopoly on force" short-hands are a much more recent emergence,…
……而且他是上个世纪作品被阅读最多的宪法学者之一。不确定马克斯·韦伯会不会做出同样的选择，大概率不会（他对英国宪法极其精通，他的《经济与社会》大量引用了梅特兰的《英国法律史》），但他给我的感觉也不像是个狂热的民主权利支持者。另外还有海德格尔彻底倒向那一边的例子，倒也不完全……
…and he's one of the most read constitutional law writers in the last century. Not sure if Max Weber would have done the same, most probably not (he was really versed in English constitutional law, his "Economy and Society" has lots of quotes to Maitland's "History of English Law"), but he didn't strike me as a fervent supporter of democracy rights either. And there was also the definite jump made by Heidegger, not exactly…
……直到最近，我对马克斯·韦伯大部分思想的了解还仅限于其他思想家的著作（我大概 10 年前只读过他的《新教伦理》），但随着我快要把他的《经济与社会》[1] 读完，我越来越意识到我们其实就生活在马克斯·韦伯的世界里，自资本主义诞生以来我们就一直如此（私以为是从 15 世纪初算起，那时意大利城邦已经“发明”了……
…until recently I had only known of most of max Max Weber's thoughts through the books written by other thinkers (I had only read his "Protestant Ethic" about 10 years ago) but as I'm about to finish his "Economy and Society" [1] I more and more realize that we live in a Max Weber world, we have been doing so since the advent of capitalism (I'd say since the early 1400s by which time the Italian city states had "invented"…
……这种情况下，根据定义它就成了国家。国家的诉求在于其合法性。肆意妄为的行使权力等于放弃合法性。引自韦伯，马克斯 (1978). 罗斯, 冈瑟; 维蒂希, 克劳斯 (编). 《经济与社会》. 伯克利: 加州大学出版社. 第 54 页. <https://archive.org/details/economysociety00webe/page/54/mod...> 在 Talking Politics 的这期节目中，对这个常见的误解有一个绝佳的解释……
…which case it becomes, by definition the State. The state's claim is to legitimacy. A capricious exercise would be an abrogation of legitimacy Weber, Max (1978). Roth, Guenther; Wittich, Claus (eds.). Economy and Society. Berkeley: U. California P. p. 54. <https://archive.org/details/economysociety00webe/page/54/mod...> There's an excellent explanation of the common misunderstanding in this episode of the Talking Politics…
韦伯，马克斯 (1978). 罗斯, 冈瑟; 维蒂希, 克劳斯 (编). 《经济与社会》. 伯克利: 加州大学出版社. 第 54 页. https://archive.org/details/economysociety00webe/page/54/mod...
Weber, Max (1978). Roth, Guenther; Wittich, Claus (eds.). Economy and Society. Berkeley: U. California P. p. 54. https://archive.org/details/economysociety00webe/page/54/mod...