…matter: The Death and Life of Great American Cities, The Economy of Cities, and Cities and the Wealth of Nations. Peter Drucker: Entrepreneurship and Innovation. and the classic textbook: Paul Samuelson: Economics
…of which is in turn a weighted average of sub-sub-indices." and goes on to give an example (apparently ficional) in which housing makes up 41.4% of the index. Edit: My copy of Samuelson and Nordhaus, Economics, 19th edition, has an example of a consumer price index including housing weighted at 42.4%. At that weighting, unless my math is off, the remaining 57.6% of the stuff in the index would need to get cheaper…
…similar but is a different animal altogether. Attempts to build global predictive models are futile in principle and can be compared to attempts to build a model that predicts the weather a month from now. Economics needs a philosophical paradigm shift, and of course it is happening (slowly, and Santa Fe Institute is the place to watch), but is it not what you find in Samuelson books and in the mainstream academia.…
保罗·萨缪尔森的《经济学》
'Economics' by Paul Samuelson
我依然觉得最优秀的经济学教材之一就是保罗·萨缪尔森的《经济学》。当然前提是你指的是宏观经济学。
I still think one of the best textbooks on economics is Paul Samuelson's Economics. Assuming you mean macro-economics that is.
……这几本不错：《美国大城市的死与生》、《城市经济》、《城市与国家财富》。彼得·德鲁克的《创新与企业家精神》。还有那本经典教材：保罗·萨缪尔森的《经济学》
…matter: The Death and Life of Great American Cities, The Economy of Cities, and Cities and the Wealth of Nations. Peter Drucker: Entrepreneurship and Innovation. and the classic textbook: Paul Samuelson: Economics
莫里森和博伊德的《有机化学》 古吉拉蒂的《计量经济学》 萨缪尔森的《经济学》
Morrison and Boyd, Organic chemistry Guidurati, Econometrics Samuelson, Economics
……而它本身又是若干子子指数的加权平均数。”接着举了个例子（显然是虚构的），其中住房占了该指数的 41.4%。编辑补充：我手头这本萨缪尔森和诺德豪斯合著的《经济学》第 19 版里，有一个把住房权重定为 42.4% 的消费者价格指数例子。按这个权重算，除非我数学学砸了，否则指数里剩下的 57.6% 的商品就必须降价……
…of which is in turn a weighted average of sub-sub-indices." and goes on to give an example (apparently ficional) in which housing makes up 41.4% of the index. Edit: My copy of Samuelson and Nordhaus, Economics, 19th edition, has an example of a consumer price index including housing weighted at 42.4%. At that weighting, unless my math is off, the remaining 57.6% of the stuff in the index would need to get cheaper…
……类似但完全是另一回事。建立全球预测模型的尝试在原则上就是徒劳的，可以比作试图建立一个预测一个月后天气的模型。经济学需要一次哲学范式的转变，当然这正在发生（缓慢地，圣塔菲研究所是值得关注的地方），但你在萨缪尔森的书和主流学术界里找不到这个。……
…similar but is a different animal altogether. Attempts to build global predictive models are futile in principle and can be compared to attempts to build a model that predicts the weather a month from now. Economics needs a philosophical paradigm shift, and of course it is happening (slowly, and Santa Fe Institute is the place to watch), but is it not what you find in Samuelson books and in the mainstream academia.…