如何成为反种族主义者
How to Be an Antiracist
Ibram X. Kendi · 初版 2019 年
3人推荐
35位读者提及
38次提及
为什么值得读
- 揭示包括少数族裔自身在内普遍存在的种族观念
- 强调拒绝双重标准，呼吁一视同仁反思偏见
反种族主义是一个具有变革性的概念，它重塑并激活了关于种族主义的对话——更从根本上指引我们以解放性的新视角看待自我与彼此。从核心来看，种族主义是一种制造人类价值虚假等级制度的强大体系；其扭曲的逻辑不仅局限于种族，更延伸至我们对待不同族裔或肤色人群的方式，乃至对待不同性别、性别认同和体型人群的方式。种族主义与阶级、文化和地域相互交织，甚至改变了我们看待和评估自身价值的方式。在
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
非洲移民对美国黑人的种族主义偏见，完全不比其他人少。（包括美国黑人自己也是。）Kendi 的《How to be an Antiracist》探讨了这一点，我觉得非常发人深省。
African immigrants can have racist beliefs about black Americans just as much as anyone. (Including black Americans.) Kendi's "How to be an Antiracist" gets into this in a way I found to be eye-opening.
……的回应。这话听着顺耳吗？如果这是个白人至上主义者说的，我们肯定都会正确地大喊这是狗哨言论，是不可接受的回答。我希望有更多人去读读《How to Be an Antiracist》。我认为他完全说得对：唯一的出路是指出每个人的种族主义想法，而不是选择性地指出。选择性地宽容“我们这边”的种族主义观点，只会打开通往……的大门
…address. Does this sound ok to your ears? If this was a white supremacist, we would all correctly be shouting about how it's a dog whistle and not an acceptable response. I wish more people would read 'How to Be an Antiracist.' I believe he's absolute right in that the only way forward is to call out racist beliefs from everyone, not selectively. Selectively excusing racist beliefs from "our side" will only open the door…
……除非你指的是“在我们进行了激进的政策改革之后的又一个 400 年” 再次编辑：因为发帖频率限制，加上 HN 帖子里种族主义/反种族主义言论的胶着态势，我没法回复了，所以请大家去读读比如《How to be an Antiracist》，你就会明白我的出发点了。
…unless you mean "in another 400 years after we've made radical policy changes" Edit again: I can't reply bc posting speed limits and the balance of racism/antiracism in HN threads, so please go read e.g. "How to be an Antiracist" and you'll see where I'm coming from.
……这套方案行不通。它所做的一切只是让我们对种族主义持续造成的危害视而不见，进而无法改变这些体制、解决这些问题。Kendi 在他的书《How to Be an Antiracist》中对此进行了详细阐述。这里有一个 TED 演讲版的解释：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCxbl5QgFZw
…issues failed. All it did was make us blind to the continuing harms of racism and there for unable to change those systems and solve those problems. Kendi expands on it in great detail in his book "How to Be an Antiracist" Here's a TED talk version of the explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCxbl5QgFZw
如果你选择性挑拣数据（cherry-pick），哪怕有大量反例，你也能编织出自己想要的故事。Coleman Hughes 认为 Kendi 相当严重地挑拣了数据：https://www.city-journal.org/how-to-be-an-antiracist
If you cherry-pick data, you can advance a narrative even if there are lots of counter-examples. Coleman Hughes argues that Kendi cherry-picks data quite a lot: https://www.city-journal.org/how-to-be-an-antiracist
……部分回答了我的问题：> 有这么三部曲一样的存在，分别由 Ta-Nehisi Coates 的《Between the World and Me》、Robin DiAngelo 的《White Fragility》和 Ibram Kendi 的《How to Be an Antiracist》组成。这三本书的套装摆在全美各地的咖啡桌和壁炉架上都会占有一席之地。
…partially answer my question: > There is what we could think of as a triple-Testament tome, consisting of Ta-Nehisi Coates’ Between the World and Me, Robin DiAngelo’s White Fragility, and Ibram Kendi’s How to Be an Antiracist. A box set of the three would take its place on coffeetables and mantlepieces nationwide.