专家之死
The death of expertise
Thomas M. Nichols、Sean Pratt · 初版 2017 年
9人推荐
16位读者提及
21次提及
为什么值得读
- 剖析人人自称专家的网络愚昧主义现象
- 揭示反智主义对既定专业知识权威的侵蚀
- 探讨社会各阶层抗拒专业意见的深层根源
对专业知识的反感情绪与反智主义不谋而合，引发了从反疫苗运动到抨击 GMO 等传播极广却缺乏依据的激烈争论。正如 Tom Nichols 在 The Death of Expertise 中所指出的，这种情况的发生有诸多原因——从互联网搜索引擎的便捷使用，到高等教育领域推行的客户满意度模式。“多亏了技术进步和教育水平的提高，我们能够接触到的信息比以往任何时候都要多。然而，信息并没有开启一个新的启蒙时代，反而
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
> 不幸的是，在社交媒体上，人人都能摇身一变成了专家！普通人又怎么分得清呢？ Tom Nichols 写的一本好书：* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_of_Expertise 这倒不是什么新鲜事：> 在美国，存在着一种对无知的狂热崇拜，而且一直都存在。反智主义的这股暗流一直是一条贯穿我们政治……的红线
> Unfortunately, in social media, everybody gets to be an expert! How can the average person tell? Good book by Tom Nichols: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_of_Expertise Not anything recent: > There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political…
你就是 Tom Nichols 的《The Death of Expertise》（专家的消亡）这本书的绝佳目标读者。他把这一切都讲透了。
You are the perfect audience for The Death of Expertise by Tom Nichols. He covers all of this.
……科技精英。但这与所有参与这类事情的非科技、非精英人群的情况不符。事实上，这与 Tom Nichols 在他 2017 年的书《The Death of Expertise》[1] 中讨论的几乎是一回事。推荐一读。[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat's_Cradle [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_of_Expertise 编辑：删除了多余的冠词。
…tech elites. But that doesn't comport with all non-tech, non-elites who also engage in this sort of thing. In fact, it's pretty much the same thing discussed by Tom Nichols in his 2017 book[1], The Death of Expertise. I recommend it. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat's_Cradle [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_of_Expertise Edit: Removed extraneous article.
想更深入了解你的这种观点，可以看看 Tom Nichols 的《The Death of Expertise》[1]（现在也出成书了）。1. http://thefederalist.com/2014/01/17/the-death-of-expertise/
See Tom Nichols' "The Death of Expertise"[1] (now also a book) for more on your sentiment. 1. http://thefederalist.com/2014/01/17/the-death-of-expertise/
同样值得关注的还有：Tom Nichols 的《The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters》（专家的消亡：反对既定知识的运动及其危害）（https://www.amazon.com/Death-Expertise-Campaign-Established-...）
Also of interest: Tom Nichols, The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters (https://www.amazon.com/Death-Expertise-Campaign-Established-...)
不，现实中确实有我们应该依赖的专家。当然，没有哪个经济学家能完美预测——预测未来本来就很难。Tom Nichols 的书《The Death of Expertise》就和这里很契合。—— 至于你的具体论点：- 保罗·克鲁格曼（Paul Krugman）在他的重大预测上一直准得惊人。他之前就谈到了媒体的各打五十大板（bothsidesism），这是造成当下政治……的主要原因
No, there are actually experts that we should rely on. Of course no economist is a perfect predicter- predicting the future is hard. Tom Nichols’ book The Death of Expertise is relevant here. —— As for your specific points: - Paul Krugman, on his major predictions, has been incredibly prescient. He was talking about media bothsidesism, a major reason for this political…