…level. I had the immense pleasure of taking a workshop with Kyle Simpson, the author, at a conference last year and it covered much of the material from his books. In particular I found the book on 'this' and object prototypes to be fantastic.
"Eloquent Javascript" (http://eloquentjavascript.net/) definitely gets my vote, as it starts with concepts that someone new to programming would need to understand before diving into the specifics of the language. Available to read online for free, although well worth spending money on a physical copy to thumb through, but it may be a little too slow to get going for someone who already has experi
《设计数据密集型应用》（Data Intensive Applications）、《this 与对象原型》（This and Object Prototypes，你不知道的 JS 系列）、《Fall: Or Dodge in Hell》、《Fortress Marin》、《零伯爵》（Count Zero）、《做你自己》（Become What You Are，阿兰·沃茨）、《剑与电路》（Swords and Circuitry）、《地球号太空船操作手记》（Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth）、《加利福尼亚的高原西耶拉》……
Data Intensive Applications This and Object Prototypes (You Don't Know JS Series) Fall: Or Dodge in Hell Fortress Marin Count Zero Become What You Are (Alan Watts) Swords and Circuitry Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth The High Sierra of California…
Huge fan of this article. Makes some really great points! Wish I could share and vote it up a thousand times. :)
I have been writing about exactly this topic, of why classes don't make sense (specifically for JS), in my second title of the "You Don't Know JS" book series, "this & Object Prototypes".
In particular, Chapter 6 makes the case for an alternate pattern to class-orientation design, whi
Just curious what parts you looked at? Did you glance at the table of contents, or did you read full chapters?
I skimmed through pretty much all of "Scope & Closures". I also looked through the first few chapters of "this & Object Prototypes" to see whether they were any better.
If you had any specific feedback on what I could have done better to live up to the title, tone, and mission of the bo
……水平。去年有幸在一个大会上参加了作者 Kyle Simpson 的 workshop，内容涵盖了他书里的很多精髓。尤其是关于“this”和 object prototypes 的那本，我觉得写得太棒了。
…level. I had the immense pleasure of taking a workshop with Kyle Simpson, the author, at a conference last year and it covered much of the material from his books. In particular I found the book on 'this' and object prototypes to be fantastic.
《Eloquent Javascript》（http://eloquentjavascript.net/）绝对能拿到我这一票，因为它在深入这门语言的细节之前，会先从编程新手必须理解的基础概念讲起。可以在线免费阅读，不过花钱买本实体书随手翻翻也很值，只是对于已经有经
"Eloquent Javascript" (http://eloquentjavascript.net/) definitely gets my vote, as it starts with concepts that someone new to programming would need to understand before diving into the specifics of the language. Available to read online for free, although well worth spending money on a physical copy to thumb through, but it may be a little too slow to get going for someone who already has experi
《设计数据密集型应用》（Data Intensive Applications）、《this 与对象原型》（This and Object Prototypes，你不知道的 JS 系列）、《Fall: Or Dodge in Hell》、《Fortress Marin》、《零伯爵》（Count Zero）、《做你自己》（Become What You Are，阿兰·沃茨）、《剑与电路》（Swords and Circuitry）、《地球号太空船操作手记》（Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth）、《加利福尼亚的高原西耶拉》……
Data Intensive Applications This and Object Prototypes (You Don't Know JS Series) Fall: Or Dodge in Hell Fortress Marin Count Zero Become What You Are (Alan Watts) Swords and Circuitry Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth The High Sierra of California…
这篇文章太赞了，说到了心坎里！真希望能分享出去并点赞一千次。:) 我一直在“你不知道的 JavaScript”（You Don't Know JS）系列的第二部《this 与对象原型》（this & Object Prototypes）中探讨的正是这个主题，即为什么类（class）在（特别是 JS 中）行不通。 尤其是第 6 章，论证了一种替代面向类（class-orientation）设计的模式，该
Huge fan of this article. Makes some really great points! Wish I could share and vote it up a thousand times. :) I have been writing about exactly this topic, of why classes don't make sense (specifically for JS), in my second title of the "You Don't Know JS" book series, "this & Object Prototypes". In particular, Chapter 6 makes the case for an alternate pattern to class-orientation design, whi
只是好奇你看了哪部分？是随便翻了翻目录，还是完整读了几个章节？ 我基本把《作用域与闭包》（Scope & Closures）粗略翻了一遍。另外也看了《this 与对象原型》（this & Object Prototypes）的前几章，想看看会不会好一点。 如果你有什么具体反馈，关于我怎么做才能更契合这本书的标题、语调和初衷，我非常乐意倾
Just curious what parts you looked at? Did you glance at the table of contents, or did you read full chapters? I skimmed through pretty much all of "Scope & Closures". I also looked through the first few chapters of "this & Object Prototypes" to see whether they were any better. If you had any specific feedback on what I could have done better to live up to the title, tone, and mission of the bo