氦液滴中的宇宙
The universe in a helium droplet
G. E. Volovik · 初版 2009 年
3人推荐
3位读者提及
3次提及
本书全面概述了 condensed matter physics 与 quantum field theory 以及 elementary particle physics 现象之间的类比关系。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
The universe in a helium droplet
G. E. Volovik · 初版 2009 年
本书全面概述了 condensed matter physics 与 quantum field theory 以及 elementary particle physics 现象之间的类比关系。
正在加载完整评论……
……关于黑洞。Laughlin 对洛伦兹不变性（Lorentz invariance）完全避而不谈。要想看真正沿着 Laughlin 的方向深入探索、并且比他好上十万倍还带有可检验预测的成果，可以看看 G. Volovik 的书《氦滴中的宇宙》（The Universe in a Helium Droplet）
…about black holes. Laughlin has nothing to say about Lorentz invariance. For a real stab down Laughlin's direction, done 100,000 times better with testable predictions, check out G. Volovik's book "The Universe in a Helium Droplet"
想要深入了解这背后的理论，我推荐 Volovik 写的《氦滴中的宇宙》（The Universe in a Helium Droplet）[1]。1. https://academic.oup.com/book/11557
For a highly in-depth look at the theory behind this, I can recommend “The Universe in a Helium Droplet” by Volovik [1]. 1. https://academic.oup.com/book/11557
那篇文章描述的是一个假想的引力微观物理模型。这是个老点子了，别人做得比他更好（比如参考《氦滴中的宇宙》[1]）。不管它是对是错，都跟你说的“引力本身并不会把引力体验为弯曲表面”毫无关系。任何合理的引力微观物理模型都必须能够复现……
That article describes a hypothetical microphysical model of gravity. It's an old idea which has been done better by others (see e.g. "The Universe in a Helium Droplet" [1]). Whether right or wrong, it has no bearing on your claim that > Gravity, arguably, does not experience gravity as a curved surface. Any valid microphysical model of gravity must be able to reproduce…