在光谱的另一端，我强烈推荐 Spivak 的《Physics for Mathematicians》[1]。我认为对于想要学习物理的数学家来说，没有任何其他书能比得上它。[] https://www.amazon.com/Physics-Mathematicians-Mechanics-Mich...
On the other side of the spectrum, I would recommend Spivak's Physics for Mathematicians [1] strongly. I don't think anything else could come close for a mathematician who wants to learn physics. [] https://www.amazon.com/Physics-Mathematicians-Mechanics-Mich...
……通过听或看教学材料，绝对不容错过。费曼对这些内容的纯粹热情很难单靠文字表达出来。本着 SICP 的精神，我也很喜欢 Spivak 那本不走寻常路的《Physics for Mathematicians》[2]，但正如书名所示，与大多数力学入门教材相比，它假定读者具备更多、或至少不同的数学预备知识。“扎实的本科数学背景——至少学过一门……
…listening or watching instructive material, shouldn't be missed. Feynman's sheer enthusiasm for the material is hard to get across in print. In the spirit of SICP, I also like Spivak's less conventional Physics for Mathematicians [2], but, as the title suggests, this assumes more, or at least different, mathematical prerequisites than most introductory mechanics texts. "Strong undergraduate maths background — at least one course…
Spivak (of differential geometry fame) wrote a book with this precise title: https://archive.org/details/physics-for-mathematicians-mecha... It's a very interesting take on classical mechanics.
Michael Spivak 的《Physics for Mathematicians》里有很多像这里点赞最高回答那样的论证，解答了为什么经典力学的数学形式会是现在这个样子这类问题。
Michael Spivak's Physics for Mathematicians has a lot of arguments like the one in the top answer here, answering questions about why the math of classical mechanics is the way it is.
在光谱的另一端，我强烈推荐 Spivak 的《Physics for Mathematicians》[1]。我认为对于想要学习物理的数学家来说，没有任何其他书能比得上它。[] https://www.amazon.com/Physics-Mathematicians-Mechanics-Mich...
On the other side of the spectrum, I would recommend Spivak's Physics for Mathematicians [1] strongly. I don't think anything else could come close for a mathematician who wants to learn physics. [] https://www.amazon.com/Physics-Mathematicians-Mechanics-Mich...
……通过听或看教学材料，绝对不容错过。费曼对这些内容的纯粹热情很难单靠文字表达出来。本着 SICP 的精神，我也很喜欢 Spivak 那本不走寻常路的《Physics for Mathematicians》[2]，但正如书名所示，与大多数力学入门教材相比，它假定读者具备更多、或至少不同的数学预备知识。“扎实的本科数学背景——至少学过一门……
…listening or watching instructive material, shouldn't be missed. Feynman's sheer enthusiasm for the material is hard to get across in print. In the spirit of SICP, I also like Spivak's less conventional Physics for Mathematicians [2], but, as the title suggests, this assumes more, or at least different, mathematical prerequisites than most introductory mechanics texts. "Strong undergraduate maths background — at least one course…
Spivak 的《Physics for Mathematicians》基本上就是用现代语言和严谨性重新翻新过的《自然哲学的数学原理》。
Physics for Mathematicians by Spivak is basically the Principia updated to modern prose and rigor.
Spivak（以微分几何闻名的那位）写过一本完全就是这个书名的书：https://archive.org/details/physics-for-mathematicians-mecha... 这是对经典力学非常有趣的一种解读。
Spivak (of differential geometry fame) wrote a book with this precise title: https://archive.org/details/physics-for-mathematicians-mecha... It's a very interesting take on classical mechanics.
Michael Spivak 的《Physics for Mathematicians》里有很多像这里点赞最高回答那样的论证，解答了为什么经典力学的数学形式会是现在这个样子这类问题。
Michael Spivak's Physics for Mathematicians has a lot of arguments like the one in the top answer here, answering questions about why the math of classical mechanics is the way it is.
Spivak 的《Physics for Mathematicians》简直是神作——甚至对物理学家来说也是如此。而《Quantum Field Theory for the gifted amateur》读起来也出奇地有趣。
Spivaks Physics for Mathematicians is a blessing - even for physicists. and Quantum Field Theory for the gifted amateur is a surprisingly fun read.