…他的视频和演讲结构完全就是布道那一套。他甚至还假装出一种牧师式的虚伪谦逊。我强烈推荐雅克·埃吕尔（Jacques Ellul）的《Les nouveaux possédés》（英文译为《The New Demons》[1]），写于 1973 年，分析的正是你描述的这种现象——即现代事物（比如摇滚明星等）试图去填补宗教消亡留下的空缺。自从我…
…his videos and lectures are structured exactly the same way as sermons. He even feigns a false pastor modesty I highly recommend Jacques Ellul's "Les nouveaux possédés." (translated in English as "The New Demons" [1]) an analysis written back in 1973 describing this exact process you're describing, i.e. modern stuff (rock stars among others) trying to fill the hole of the disappearing religion. Ever since I've…
…如果算“耸人听闻”，那反倒在某种程度上印证了我的观点。而且我也不生活在硅谷圈子里，也许在那边 AGI 教派势力更大，这我就不得而知了。我强烈推荐雅克·埃吕尔的《The New Demons》[1]，以及埃吕尔的大部分著作。[1] https://www.amazon.com/New-Demons-Jacques-Ellul/dp/081640266...
…in that “sensationalist” then it all kind of proves my point. I also don’t live in the SV bubble, maybe down there the AGI church is stronger, I wouldn’t know. I strongly recommend Jacques Ellul’s “The New Demons” [1], and Ellul’s works generally speaking. [1] https://www.amazon.com/New-Demons-Jacques-Ellul/dp/081640266...
…这条评论说得一针见血，我们需要有组织、集体性的“空间”和团体来抗衡数字技术的强行灌输。[1] 我不想列一大堆技术批判文献和参考文献来烦大家，但雅克·埃吕尔（《New Demons》、《Empire of Non-Sense》）、伊万·伊里奇（《Tools for Conviviality》）和尼尔·波兹曼（尤其是《技术垄断》和《娱乐至死》）——都是理解为何难以明确区分…的绝佳读物。
…comment is spot-on, we need collectively organised "spaces" and groups to challenge digital imposition. [1] Not wishing to bore with lots of tech critique literature and references but Jacques Ellul (New Demons, Empire of Non-Sense), Ivan Illich (Tools for Conviviality) and Neil Postman (particularly Technopoly and Amusing Ourselves to death) - all good materials to understand the difficulty of neatly distinguishing…
…他的视频和演讲结构完全就是布道那一套。他甚至还假装出一种牧师式的虚伪谦逊。我强烈推荐雅克·埃吕尔（Jacques Ellul）的《Les nouveaux possédés》（英文译为《The New Demons》[1]），写于 1973 年，分析的正是你描述的这种现象——即现代事物（比如摇滚明星等）试图去填补宗教消亡留下的空缺。自从我…
…his videos and lectures are structured exactly the same way as sermons. He even feigns a false pastor modesty I highly recommend Jacques Ellul's "Les nouveaux possédés." (translated in English as "The New Demons" [1]) an analysis written back in 1973 describing this exact process you're describing, i.e. modern stuff (rock stars among others) trying to fill the hole of the disappearing religion. Ever since I've…
…如果算“耸人听闻”，那反倒在某种程度上印证了我的观点。而且我也不生活在硅谷圈子里，也许在那边 AGI 教派势力更大，这我就不得而知了。我强烈推荐雅克·埃吕尔的《The New Demons》[1]，以及埃吕尔的大部分著作。[1] https://www.amazon.com/New-Demons-Jacques-Ellul/dp/081640266...
…in that “sensationalist” then it all kind of proves my point. I also don’t live in the SV bubble, maybe down there the AGI church is stronger, I wouldn’t know. I strongly recommend Jacques Ellul’s “The New Demons” [1], and Ellul’s works generally speaking. [1] https://www.amazon.com/New-Demons-Jacques-Ellul/dp/081640266...
…这条评论说得一针见血，我们需要有组织、集体性的“空间”和团体来抗衡数字技术的强行灌输。[1] 我不想列一大堆技术批判文献和参考文献来烦大家，但雅克·埃吕尔（《New Demons》、《Empire of Non-Sense》）、伊万·伊里奇（《Tools for Conviviality》）和尼尔·波兹曼（尤其是《技术垄断》和《娱乐至死》）——都是理解为何难以明确区分…的绝佳读物。
…comment is spot-on, we need collectively organised "spaces" and groups to challenge digital imposition. [1] Not wishing to bore with lots of tech critique literature and references but Jacques Ellul (New Demons, Empire of Non-Sense), Ivan Illich (Tools for Conviviality) and Neil Postman (particularly Technopoly and Amusing Ourselves to death) - all good materials to understand the difficulty of neatly distinguishing…