猜想与反驳

Conjectures and refutations

Karl Popper、Michelle Irene、de Launay Marc B.、Melitta Mew · 初版 1962 年

9人推荐

17位读者提及

20次提及

为什么值得读

科学哲学领域极具启发性的核心经典
观点鲜明且充满激情的理性求索之作
适合作为探讨科学认知脉络的重要指南

Hacker News 上怎么说

xenophanes · 2009 年
我想加上《Conjectures and Refutations》（卡尔·波普尔）《The Fabric of Reality》（戴维·多伊奇）。另外费曼也写过一些篇幅较短/较浅显但很严肃的物理书，有些人可能会更喜欢：《QED》和《The Character of Physical Law》。还有他的计算……
I'd add Conjectures and Refutations (Karl Popper) The Fabric of Reality (David Deutsch) Also Feynman has some shorter/easier but serious physics books that some might prefer: QED and The Character of Physical Law. And his computation…
8iterations · 2018 年
《Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge》（猜想与反驳：科学知识的增长）是我最喜欢的卡尔·波普尔作品。他 1945 年关于“宽容悖论”的论述放在这里似乎更贴切。
"Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge" is my favorite work by Karl Popper. His 1945 work on the Paradox of Tolerance seems more appropriate here.
noahlt · 2015 年
我想补充一本：卡尔·波普尔的《Conjectures and Refutations》。
I would add: Conjectures and Refutations, by Karl Popper.
fbrusch · 2015 年
……量子力学的解释，以及它那句（臭名）昭著的格言：“闭嘴，计算！”）如果你对这种推导思路感兴趣，我觉得戴维·多伊奇（《The Beginning of Infinity》）和卡尔·波普尔（《Conjectures and Refutations》）是两个充满激情（且观点鲜明）的声音！
…interpretation of quantum mechanics, and its (in)famous motto: "Shut up and calculate"!) If you are interested in this line of reasoning, I found David Deutsch ("The beginning of infinity") and Karl Popper ("Conjectures and Refutations") two passionate (and opinionated) voices!
bduerst · 2016 年
……我刚才说的内容，紧接着是它的核心重点，而你全给忽略了。鉴于你有这么多疑问，而我实在没时间给你上一堂科学哲学历史课，如果你真的诚心想要了解更多，你应该去读读卡尔·波普尔的《Conjectures and Refutations》。
…what I just said, followed with what it's focus is which you ignored. Since you have a lot of questions and I don't really have the time to give a history lesson in science philosophy, you should read Conjectures and Refutations by Karl Popper if you are genuinely earnest with your inquiries to learn more.
defaultprimate · 2022 年
你应该读读卡尔·波普尔的《Conjectures and Refutations》。你可以对界定什么是客观真理的新证据保持开放心态，而不必因为未知的未知（unknown unknowns）就全盘否定客观真理的存在。
You should read Karl Popper's Conjectures and Refutations. You can be open to new evidence defining what objective truth is without dismissing the existence of objective truth due to unknown unknowns.

正在加载完整评论……