面向科学家和工程师的物理学
Physics for scientists and engineers
Paul A. Tipler、Gene Mosca · 初版 1990 年
5人推荐
8位读者提及
8次提及
充分利用Serway/Jewett的《PHYSICS FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS》（第十版）所提供的丰富资源，助你在课程中取得最佳成绩。从丰富的正文特色板块到一系列出色的技术资源，你将获得理解自然力与物理学原理所需的一切。全新的情境拓展习题、Think-Pair-Share问题以及MCAT风格的阅读理解题，能够让你将所学知识付诸实践。此外，书中还配套了全球最易用的作业系统WebAssign。在每一章中，作者都融入了广泛的例题、习题
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
《Physics for Scientists and Engineers》，Paul A. Tipler、Gene Mosca 著 https://www.macmillanlearning.com/college/us/product/Physics...
Physics for Scientists and Engineers Paul A. Tipler; Gene Mosca https://www.macmillanlearning.com/college/us/product/Physics...
……要是说教材的话，这真得看你想学哪个方向（代数、微积分、力学、电磁学……）。如果你想要一本通识类的，很多大学的选择已经证明了这本就是首选：Paul A. Tipler 和 Gene Mosca 著的《Physics for Scientists and Engineers》（当然最新版更好），还有 Hewitt 写的《Conceptual Physics》http://www.conceptualphysics.com/
…are talking about textbooks, it really depends on what topic you want to learn (Algebra, Calculus, Mechanics, Electromagnetism…). If you want a generalist one, many colleges' choice has proven it's: Physics for Scientists and Engineers (the latest Edition is better of course) by Paul A. Tipler (Author), Gene Mosca Conceptual Physics by Hewitt http://www.conceptualphysics.com/
我看到好多人推荐 Halliday 和 Resnick，但我大学时用的是 Serway 的《Physics for Scientists and Engineers》，我觉得那本教材是我读过最好的教材之一。不过我大学毕业都好久了，也许现在它已经不吃香了？
I see a lot of people recommending Halliday and Resnick, but I used Serway- Physics for Scientists and Engineers in college and that textbook was one of the best I felt I ever read. Its been quite some time since I was in college though, maybe its fallen out of favor?
……在没有必要数学基础和不做物理习题的情况下。[美剧同名教材]《The Mechanical Universe》在 Amazon 上依然能买到。如果你更喜欢新一点的教材，Serway 的《Physics for Scientists and Engineers》口碑很好，还有 Halliday & Resnick 也很不错，不过后者更偏向把物理作为职业的人。[补充更新] 关于别处提到的《费曼物理学讲义》，虽然费曼当初确实打算……
…without having the necessary mathematical background and doing the physics exercises. The Mechanical Universe textbooks are still available on Amazon. If you prefer a more recent textbook, Serway's "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" is well regarded, as is Halliday & Resnick, though the latter is aimed more at career physicists. [EDIT] Regarding the Feynman Lectures on Physics mentioned elsewhere, while Feynman indeed intended…
……他们的书从一开始就给出真正的方程（比如相对论动量方程，而不是简单写成 p=mv），然后再把大家更熟悉的公式作为近似形式列出来，这很合理。Randall Knight 的《Physics for Scientists and Engineers》比那两本要标准规范得多，但仍然比我用过的大多数传统教材强出十万八千里：它在更小的细节上改良了传统规范，同时依然融入了大量基于研究的……
…reasonable for their book to give true equations from the start (like the equation for relativistic momentum rather than just p=mv) and then state the more familiar forms as approximations. Randall Knight's Physics for Scientists and Engineers is a much more standard text than those two, but it's still worlds better than most traditional texts that I've used: it changes the old standards in smaller ways, but still incorporating lots of research-based…
……一些本应足够精确到能够检测出地球轨道运动及其对光速影响的实验。用 Google 搜索“1890 speed of light experiments”，你应该能找到《Modern Physics for Scientists and Engineers》第 21 到 27 页。里面讲到了表明光速恒定的干涉仪实验。http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interferometry
…some experiments that should have been accurate enough to detect the orbital motion of the earth and it's effect on the speed of light. Google '1890 speed of light experiments' and you should get Modern Physics for Scientists and Engineers page 21 - 27. It talks about the interferometer experiments that suggested the speed of light was constant. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interferometry