…有点自相矛盾（oxymoron）。更确切地说，它是政府对特定思想实施的强制垄断——根本就不是什么财产。想了解更多奥地利学派对知识产权的看法，去读读 Stephan Kinsella 的《Against Intellectual Property》。
…something of an oxymoron. More properly, it is a government enforced monopoly on particular ideas -- not property at all. For much more about Austrian views on intellectual property, take a look at Against Intellectual Property by Stephan Kinsella.
…给你两个出处。第一个是 Peter Drahos 和 John Braithwaite 写的《Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy?》，用真实案例记录了 IP 带来的危害。第二个是 Stephan Kinsella 的《Against Intellectual Property》，属于哲学/自由意志主义立场的论证。（《Information Feudalism》的作者们并不认为应该废除 IP，所以你可能会觉得它更可信一些。）
…give you two sources. The first, "Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy?" by Peter Drahos and John Braithwaite chronicles the harm brought by IP with real world examples. The second, "Against Intellectual Property" by Stephan Kinsella is a philosophical/libertarian argument. (The authors of Information Feudalism don't think IP should be abolished, so you may find it more credible.)
…with Physical Property rights. True to form, his book is available for free in digital formats: http://mises.org/resources/3582/Against-Intellectual-Propert... And audio: http://blog.mises.org/11717/against-intellectual-property-au... EDIT: clarified that Kinsella is a lawyer and knows this subject well
…当多人想要获取具有竞争性的物品（rivalrous goods）时控制冲突。知识产权是一堆杂七杂八概念的集合体，但如果以版权为例，根本没有类似的合理依据。参见 Stephan Kinsella 的《Against Intellectual Property》：http://mises.org/journals/jls/15_2/15_2_1.pdf
…control conflicts when multiple people want to access rivalrous goods. Intellectual property is a collection of disparate concepts, but if we take copyright, there's no similar justification for it. See Against Intellectual Property, by Stephan Kinsella: http://mises.org/journals/jls/15_2/15_2_1.pdf
…知识产权的核心概念是将一套法律体系应用于对观念的所有权。这套法律体系必须由某个具备强制力的第三方来执行。（关于为什么是这样，我援引 Stephan Kinsella 的《Against Intellectual Property》——http://mises.org/journals/jls/15_2/15_2_1.pdf。）对有形物品（其使用在物理上具有排他性）的财产权并不需要强制性…的捍卫。
…fundamental concept of intellectual property to be the application of a body of law to the ownership of ideas. This body of law must be enforced by some coercive third party. (I defer to Stephan Kinsella's "Against Intellectual Property" - http://mises.org/journals/jls/15_2/15_2_1.pdf - for an explanation of why that is.) Property rights over tangible things (whose use is physically exclusionary) do not require the defense of a coercive…
…market, because it mandates that someone prevents you from using your own resources as you see fit (namely, copying a DVD you own on a computer you own, using electricity you're paying for). Kinsella's "Against Intellectual Property" is probably the best resource point out the contradiction between Imaginary Property and the free market.
…有点自相矛盾（oxymoron）。更确切地说，它是政府对特定思想实施的强制垄断——根本就不是什么财产。想了解更多奥地利学派对知识产权的看法，去读读 Stephan Kinsella 的《Against Intellectual Property》。
…something of an oxymoron. More properly, it is a government enforced monopoly on particular ideas -- not property at all. For much more about Austrian views on intellectual property, take a look at Against Intellectual Property by Stephan Kinsella.
…给你两个出处。第一个是 Peter Drahos 和 John Braithwaite 写的《Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy?》，用真实案例记录了 IP 带来的危害。第二个是 Stephan Kinsella 的《Against Intellectual Property》，属于哲学/自由意志主义立场的论证。（《Information Feudalism》的作者们并不认为应该废除 IP，所以你可能会觉得它更可信一些。）
…give you two sources. The first, "Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy?" by Peter Drahos and John Braithwaite chronicles the harm brought by IP with real world examples. The second, "Against Intellectual Property" by Stephan Kinsella is a philosophical/libertarian argument. (The authors of Information Feudalism don't think IP should be abolished, so you may find it more credible.)
…与有形财产所有权相比。不出所料，他的书提供了免费的电子版：http://mises.org/resources/3582/Against-Intellectual-Propert... 还有音频版：http://blog.mises.org/11717/against-intellectual-property-au... EDIT：补充说明 Kinsella 是一名律师，对这个领域非常精通
…with Physical Property rights. True to form, his book is available for free in digital formats: http://mises.org/resources/3582/Against-Intellectual-Propert... And audio: http://blog.mises.org/11717/against-intellectual-property-au... EDIT: clarified that Kinsella is a lawyer and knows this subject well
…当多人想要获取具有竞争性的物品（rivalrous goods）时控制冲突。知识产权是一堆杂七杂八概念的集合体，但如果以版权为例，根本没有类似的合理依据。参见 Stephan Kinsella 的《Against Intellectual Property》：http://mises.org/journals/jls/15_2/15_2_1.pdf
…control conflicts when multiple people want to access rivalrous goods. Intellectual property is a collection of disparate concepts, but if we take copyright, there's no similar justification for it. See Against Intellectual Property, by Stephan Kinsella: http://mises.org/journals/jls/15_2/15_2_1.pdf
…知识产权的核心概念是将一套法律体系应用于对观念的所有权。这套法律体系必须由某个具备强制力的第三方来执行。（关于为什么是这样，我援引 Stephan Kinsella 的《Against Intellectual Property》——http://mises.org/journals/jls/15_2/15_2_1.pdf。）对有形物品（其使用在物理上具有排他性）的财产权并不需要强制性…的捍卫。
…fundamental concept of intellectual property to be the application of a body of law to the ownership of ideas. This body of law must be enforced by some coercive third party. (I defer to Stephan Kinsella's "Against Intellectual Property" - http://mises.org/journals/jls/15_2/15_2_1.pdf - for an explanation of why that is.) Property rights over tangible things (whose use is physically exclusionary) do not require the defense of a coercive…
…市场，因为它的规定阻止了你按自己的意愿使用自己的资源（具体来说，就是用你自己的电脑、花你交的电费，去复制一张你拥有的 DVD）。Kinsella 的《Against Intellectual Property》大概是指明“想象财产”（Imaginary Property）与自由市场之间矛盾的最佳参考了。
…market, because it mandates that someone prevents you from using your own resources as you see fit (namely, copying a DVD you own on a computer you own, using electricity you're paying for). Kinsella's "Against Intellectual Property" is probably the best resource point out the contradiction between Imaginary Property and the free market.