穿越实时
Across Realtime
Vernor Vinge · 初版 1986 年
8人推荐
14位读者提及
15次提及
为什么值得读
- 详尽展开静止泡带来的人类时间停滞构想
- 完整收录和平之战与贯穿奇点的故事
- 核心设定严谨，仅依托单项关键科学突破
收录了 The Peace War 与 Marooned in Realtime 的合集。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
Across Realtime
Vernor Vinge · 初版 1986 年
收录了 The Peace War 与 Marooned in Realtime 的合集。
正在加载完整评论……
如果对这个概念感兴趣，V. Vinge 的《Across Realtime》系列（主要是《Marooned in Realtime》）探讨了这个概念。人类发明了静滞泡（stasis bubbles，泡泡内部时间静止或几乎静止），你可以把自己、飞船、城镇等套进泡泡里封存任意多年……
If interested in the concept, V. Vinge's Across Realtime books, mainly Maroneed in Realtime explores this concept. Humanity invents stasis bubbles (time stands still inside or almost still), and you can bubble yourself, ships, towns etc for any amount of years.…
我赞同推荐 Vinge 的作品。真正让我惊掉下巴的 Vinge 作品是《Marooned in Realtime》，我认为最好结合《Across Realtime》合集里的其他作品一起读：https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/167844.Across_Realtime 如果想玩烧脑的，我推荐 David Brin 的《Kiln People》。要是你能把自己的意识 fork 到另一具身体里，并且定期重新合并（rejoin），会怎么样？……
I concur on the Vinge picks. The Vinge story that really blew my mind was "Marooned in Realtime", which I contend is best read in the context of the other works in "Across Realtime": https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/167844.Across_Realtime For mind games, I submit "Kiln People" by David Brin. What if you could fork your consciousness into another body and rejoin periodically?…
……读完。《Marooned in Realtime》能更好地展现技术奇点（Singularity），不过你确实得先读《The Peace War》；这个合集把两部都收进去了，还附带一篇承前启后的短篇：http://www.amazon.com/Across-Realtime-Vernor-Vinge/dp/185798...
…through. Marooned in Realtime is better for getting the Singularity across, although you really need to read The Peace War first; this collection has both plus a bridging short: http://www.amazon.com/Across-Realtime-Vernor-Vinge/dp/185798...
每当聊起这个话题，我就喜欢甩出这个链接，同时也强烈推荐 Vernor Vinge 的所有作品。我最喜欢的是《Across Realtime》。https://longnow.org/seminars/02007/feb/15/what-if-the-singul...
I like to drop this link when this topic comes up and also recommend reading anything by Vernor Vinge. My favorite is Across Realtime. https://longnow.org/seminars/02007/feb/15/what-if-the-singul...
嗯……不太确定那些故事符不符合你的想法。我能想到的唯一涉及“单一科学突破/改变”的故事是 Vernor Vinge 的《Across Realtime》（非常棒）。我记得《The Expanse》的作者之一曾经说过，他其实从没真正琢磨过聚变引擎那玩意儿到底是咋运转的。
Mmm, not sure those stories match your idea. The only story I can think of that involves a single change in science is Vernor Vinge's Across Realtime (which is very good). I think an Expanse author once commented that he'd never really thought about how the fusion drive thingies were supposed to work.
对我这种在 80 和 90 年代读科幻的人来说，我的“封神榜”是这样的（排名不分先后）：Philip K. Dick（《Man in the High Castle》）、William Gibson（《Neuromancer》）、Neal Stephenson（《Diamond Age》）、Vernor Vinge（《Across Realtime》）、Greg Egan（《Permutation City》）、Robert Reed（《Sister Alice》）、John Varley（《Eight Worlds》系列）。我相信每一代人都有自己的封神榜——不知道千禧一代和 Z 世代的会是什么。
For me, reading sci-fi in the 80s and 90s, my pantheon was (in no particular order): Philip K. Dick (Man in the High Castle) William Gibson (Neuromancer) Neil Stephenson (Diamond Age) Vernor Vinge (Across Realtime) Greg Egan (Permutation City) Robert Reed (Sister Alice) John Varley (Eight Worlds series) I'm sure every generation has its pantheon--I wonder what it is for Millennials and Gen Z.