
真名实姓
True Names
Vernor Vinge · 初版 1981 年
41人推荐
71位读者提及
111次提及
为什么值得读
- 极具前瞻性的AI赛博朋克硬科幻
- 以过硬科学设定描绘虚拟世界的运作
- 深入探讨技术治理与赛博朋克反乌托邦
“硬科学 SF 与剑与魔法意象的绝妙融合……你恨不得作者就在眼前,好为他鼓掌喝彩。”——Analog
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……

True Names
Vernor Vinge · 初版 1981 年
“硬科学 SF 与剑与魔法意象的绝妙融合……你恨不得作者就在眼前,好为他鼓掌喝彩。”——Analog
正在加载完整评论……
我觉得《我,机器人》(I, Robot)不算硬科幻。今天我第六次读了弗诺·文奇(Vernor Vinge)的扛鼎之作《真名实姓》(True Names,1981),这是一部不可思议的 AI 赛博朋克硬科幻小说,也是一部伟大的文学作品。更新:感谢大家所有极棒的推荐,如今正是从这些书中汲取灵感的最好时代……
I don't think 'i robots' are hard scifi. Today i sixth times read The greatest 'True names'(1981) by Vernor Vinge, it is an incredible AI cyberpunk hard scifi novel,aslo a great literature. Update: Thanks for all the great recommends,it is greatest time to find ideas in these books today.…
……话题我也真的很不喜欢《三体》。但我超爱《置换城市》(Permutation City)和特德·姜(Ted Chiang)的大部分作品(尤其是《赏心悦目:纪录片》和《软件体的生命周期》)。我超爱弗诺·文奇的《真名实姓》(True Names)。我也很喜欢这个:https://sifter.org/~simon/AfterLife/ 希望这对某些人有所帮助,有时候反向推荐在校准口味上跟正面推荐一样管用……
…topic I also really didn't like the three body problem. I loved Permutation City and most of Ted Chiang (particularly Liking What You See: A Documentary, and The Lifecycle of Software Objects). I love True Names by Vernor Vinge. I loved this: https://sifter.org/~simon/AfterLife/ Hopefully someone finds this helpful, sometimes an anti-recommendation can be just as useful for calibration as a recommendation.…
如果你喜欢《神经漫游者》(Neuromancer),那你应该读读弗诺·文奇的《真名实姓》(True Names)。
If you liked Neuromancer then you should read True Names by Vernor Vinge.
……没意识到我们的产品正在拼凑出一个多么疯狂的反乌托邦治理层。直面这一问题的科技原生切入点包括:- VR 之父 Jaron Lanier 的《Who Owns the Future?》- 弗诺·文奇的《True Names》(开头带评论随笔的版本)- 密码朋克(cypherpunks)圈子产出的任何东西,包括早期的比特币文档。你可以不赞同其中的技术,而且这帮人的某些观点也确实令人反感……
…not realizing the crazy dystopian governance layer our products are stitching together. Tech-native starting points that address this heads on: - “who owns the future,” Jaron Lanier, father of VR - “True Names,” the version with essays at the beginning, Vernor Vinge - Anything out of the cypherpunks, to include early bitcoin docs. You can disagree with the tech and also this group has really distasteful views…
……具体细节,因为我当时唯一的印象就是它很微不足道)。要更好地理解虚拟世界可以如何运转,包括有合理的硬科学作为依据,不妨改读斯蒂芬森的《雪崩》(Snow Crash)、文奇的《真名实姓》(True Names)或《彩虹尽头》(Rainbow's End)。读完之后,你很快就会明白为什么很多 VR 原教旨主义者极其厌恶 Oculus 的被收购案。顺便提一句,我清楚地记得 Oculus 过去的公关……
…exactly, since my only impression at the time was that it was trivial). For better ideas on how a virtual world could work, including reasonable hard science to back up claims, read Snow Crash (Stephenson), True Names (Vinge), or Rainbow's End (Vinge) instead. After that, you will quickly realize why many VR purists absolutely detest Oculus's acquisition. As a side note, I distinctly remember Oculus PR in the past…
……此外,他们的泡泡(bobble)技术让他们几乎刀枪不入,还能通过休眠在时间中穿梭跳跃。他的“界区”(Zones of Thought)系列也棒极了,完全是另一个维度的精彩。不过一定要从他的处女作《真名实姓》(True Names)读起。
…Also, their bobble technology made them virtually invulnerable, and allowed them to skip across time in stasis. His Zones of Thought series is also amazing, at a whole other level. But do start with True Names, his first published work.