俄国革命
The Russian Revolution
Sean McMeekin · 初版 2017 年
1人推荐
2位读者提及
2次提及
在《The Russian Revolution》中，历史学家 Sean McMeekin 追溯了俄国革命的起源与事件，这场革命终结了罗曼诺夫王朝的统治，将布尔什维克推上台，并改变了世界历史的进程。1900 年至 1920 年间，俄国经历了彻底而不可逆转的转变：到这两个十年结束时，新政权已经建立，经济已经崩溃，超过 2000 万俄国人在革命及随后的事件中丧生。尽管如此，布尔什维克的权力依然稳固，这得益于军事才能、暴力恐怖手段以及……的失败之间非凡的结合
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……等等。那是一个完全不道德的制度，首要目的就是让一小群人获得权力。沙皇制度当然也好不到哪去。这段历史大部分在这里有讲：https://www.amazon.com/Russian-Revolution-New-History/dp/046... 不幸的是，普京又回头赞美斯大林主义了。一个自由、民主的俄罗斯会非常有意思。
…etc. It was a completely immoral system that above all else was about a small group obtaining power. The Tsarists weren't much better, sure. Much of that history is covered here: https://www.amazon.com/Russian-Revolution-New-History/dp/046... Unfortunately, Putin is back to praising Stalinism. A free, democratic Russia would be really interesting.
想想你在用的概念。“歪曲的历史观”“主流历史学家”。按谁的说法？谷歌？亚马逊？胡佛研究所？谁来做这个决定？如果你搜“Russian Revolution”，Sean McMeekin 的著作会排得很高，部分原因是这本书被《纽约时报》、亚马逊、大型出版社等大力推广。还有谷歌。然而 McMeekin 的书是基于……
Consider the concepts you are using. "skewed view of history," "mainstream historians." According to whom? Google? Amazon? The Hoover Institution? Who make this decision? If you search for "Russian Revolution," the works of Sean McMeekin will be very high, in part because the book is being heavily promoted by the New York Times, Amazon, large publishing houses, etc. And by Google. Yet McMeekin's book is based…