软件工程的事实与谬误
Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering
Robert L. Glass · 初版 2002 年
19人推荐
30位读者提及
48次提及
为什么值得读
- 基于扎实的科研文献且行文不枯燥乏味
- 严密剖析软件预估等开发与管理核心议题
- 直击软件开发领域常年缺乏坚实论据的现状
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering
Robert L. Glass · 初版 2002 年
正在加载完整评论……
文章作者 Robert Glass 是从他自己的书《软件工程的事实与谬论》（Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering，ISBN 978-0321117427）里摘出这些的。这本书绝对值得买来一读，或者至少值得去翻翻它的目录¹。¹ 比如这里：http://blog.codinghorror.com/revisiting-the-facts-and-fallac...
The article author, Robert Glass, took these from his book, "Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering" (ISBN 978-0321117427), which is definitely worth picking up, or in the very least worth skimming the table of contents¹ of. ¹ For example, here: http://blog.codinghorror.com/revisiting-the-facts-and-fallac...
如果你想看看引用规范的书长什么样，随便挑下面一本：* 《Code Complete》 - McConnell * 《The Economics of Software Quality》 - Capers Jones * 《Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering》 - Robert Glass * 《Making Software》 - Oram & Wilson ……还有很多。并非所有引用都经受住了时间的考验，L. Bossavit 在他的书《Leprechauns of Software Engineering》中描述了……
If you want to see how a properly referenced text looks like, pick any of the following: * Code Complete - McConnell * The Economics of Software Quality - Capers Jones * Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering - Robert Glass * Making Software - Oram & Wilson ... and there are many others. Not all references have survived the test of time, L. Bossavit describes in his book " Leprechauns of Software Engineering"…
我很喜欢《人件》（Peopleware），还有 Larry Constantine 的文集《Constantine on Peopleware》，尤其是推荐给程序员的管理者看。但我感觉对于开发者来说，Robert Glass 的《软件工程的事实与谬论》（Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering）可能是个更好的推荐。
I like Peopleware, and Larry Constantine's essays Constantine on Peopleware, especially for managers of programmers. But I think Robert Glass's Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering might be a better recommendation for a developer.
……开发。所以我觉得不应该就这么轻率地把它全盘否定。我没时间去扒这方面的原始出处了，但我确实记得我读到这事的地方之一是 Robert Glass 的《软件工程的事实与谬论》（Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering），这本书很值得一读，因为它（a）有着扎实的研究文献作为依据，同时（b）又一点都不枯燥乏味。值得一提的是，这里讨论的相关研究结论跟重写有问题的模块有关……
…development. So I don't think it should be dismissed so cavalierly. I don't have time to track down the original sources on this, but I do remember that one of the places I read about it is in Robert Glass' Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering, which is worth reading because it's (a) well-grounded in the research literature, yet (b) not stupendously boring. It's worth noting that the findings in question have to do with rewriting faulty modules…
……而是由真正去写软件的人或者他们的主管来做。因此，做估算的人根本就搞错了。Glass 有本书对这些观点进行了更深入的探讨，里面有大量的文献引用（《软件工程的事实与谬论》，Robert L Glass 著），并且涵盖了各种各样非常精彩的话题。
…by the people who will build the software or by their managers. Therefore, the wrong people are doing estimation. Glass has a book that goes into more depth on these points and has numerous citations (Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering, Robert L Glass) and covers a wonderful variety of other topics.
《Implementation Patterns》，Kent Beck。这是他《Smalltalk Patterns》的半语言无关扩展，讲的是写代码时如何清晰一致地表达你想说的东西。《Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering》，Robert Glass。Glass 列出了一堆人人都知道或应该知道的事情，并给出了学术和主观的支持和/或批评，说明它们为什么成立、为什么不成立。《Making Software》，……
'Implementation Patterns', Kent Beck. A semi-language-agnostic extension of his 'Smalltalk Patterns'for how to clearly and consistently express what you're saying when you code. 'Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering', Robert Glass. Glass presents a list of things everybody knows, or ought to know, and gives both academic and opinionated support and/or critique for why they are and aren't so. 'Making Software',…