保守主义
Conservatism
Roger Scruton · 初版 2018 年
3人推荐
3位读者提及
3次提及
Roger Scruton回顾了几个世纪以来保守主义的核心思想。他一方面审视了保守主义关于公民社会、法治以及国家角色的思辨；另一方面探讨了其对自由（包括言论与结社自由）、道德、平等、财产及权利的主张。他追溯了保守主义意识形态的起源与演进，梳理了John Locke、Thomas Hobbes、David Hume、Edmund Burke、Adam Smith、John Stuart Mill、John Ruskin、Michael Oakeshott、Friedrich Hayek、Milton Friedman和Robert Nozick等先贤的哲思。他阐述了
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
我觉得大多数保守派之所以顺从并看重传统和习俗，是因为他们能真切感受到这些，即便他们未必能用同样的方式清晰表达出来。Roger Scruton 在他那本关于保守主义的书里做了很好的总结：https://www.amazon.com/Conservatism-Invitation-Tradition-Rog... 类似地，那些自由派嘴上说着“人人生而平等，拥有相同的权利，可以实行任何看似合理的做法……
I think most conservatives defer to and value tradition and customs because they feel this, even though they may not articulate it in the same way. Roger Scruton gives a nice summary, in his book on conservatism: https://www.amazon.com/Conservatism-Invitation-Tradition-Rog... Similarly liberals who say things like "all men are created equal and have the same rights and can institute whatever practices seem right…
《Conservatism: An Invitation to the Great Tradition》，Roger Scruton 著。之前我一直没搞懂保守主义到底是什么，但 Scruton 彻底改变了我的认知，尤其是在读完 Burke 的《Reflections on……》之后，感觉格外充实。
Conservatism: An Invitation to the Great Tradition, Roger Scruton So far I never understood what conservatism is, but Scruton changed it entirely, especially it felt fulfilling after reading Burke's Reflections on…
听起来像是把保守主义编造定义为“我不同意的东西”。这不是一个好定义，如果你真的想了解它是什么，可以读（或听）一些罗杰·斯克鲁顿的作品。这里有一个采访……
Sounds like a made-up definition of Conservatism as 'that which I do not agree with'. It is not a very good definition, if you really want to find out what it is about you could read (or listen to) some of Roger Scruton's works. Here's an interview…