…only the bad guys will remain. A reciprocal strategy is necessary and beneficial long-term for the world IMO. The well-known book The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins has an interesting chapter titled Nice Guys Finish First giving a good illustration relevant to this idea.
…forgive. - The agent must have a good chance of competing against the opponent more than once. The fact that this strategy was a consistent winner in his competitions has led Dawkins to argue that "nice guys finish first" and could be a partial explanation for certain forms of so-called "altruistic" animal behavior -- behavior that seemingly gives no benefit to the altruist, except for the fact that too may benefit when…
…want leaders and group members who put the interests of the group first (not a shocking conclusion): https://student-3k.tepper.cmu.edu/gsiadoc/WP/2011-E34.pdf It was pretty badly misinterpreted by the "nice guys finish first" post, and we're heaping more layers of misinterpretation on top of that. For example, the study found that people who contributed to the group at the expense of outsiders (perceived as medium-dominance)…
……就只剩下坏人了。在我看来，互惠策略对这个世界而言不仅必要，而且长期来看是有益的。Richard Dawkins 那本著名的《The Selfish Gene》（自私的基因）里有一章很有意思，叫《Nice Guys Finish First》（好人终有好报），对这个观点给出了很好的例证。
…only the bad guys will remain. A reciprocal strategy is necessary and beneficial long-term for the world IMO. The well-known book The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins has an interesting chapter titled Nice Guys Finish First giving a good illustration relevant to this idea.
而 Richard Dawkins 用博弈论（Game Theory）发现这是错的——http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nice_Guys_Finish_First
Which Richard Dawkins using Game Theory found to be wrong- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nice_Guys_Finish_First
……宽恕。- 该 agent 必须有很大概率与同一个对手交手不止一次。这种策略在他的比赛中屡屡获胜，这一事实促使 Dawkins 提出“好人终有好报”（nice guys finish first），并且这可以部分解释某些所谓的动物“利他”行为——这种行为表面上对利他者毫无益处，除了在……时也可能受益这一事实……
…forgive. - The agent must have a good chance of competing against the opponent more than once. The fact that this strategy was a consistent winner in his competitions has led Dawkins to argue that "nice guys finish first" and could be a partial explanation for certain forms of so-called "altruistic" animal behavior -- behavior that seemingly gives no benefit to the altruist, except for the fact that too may benefit when…
……希望领导者和群组成员把团队利益放在首位（并不算什么惊天结论）：https://student-3k.tepper.cmu.edu/gsiadoc/WP/2011-E34.pdf 那篇“好人终有好报”（nice guys finish first）的帖子把它曲解得相当厉害，而我们又在上面叠了更多层误读。例如，该研究发现，那些以牺牲局外人利益来为本群组做贡献的人（被视作具有中等支配地位）……
…want leaders and group members who put the interests of the group first (not a shocking conclusion): https://student-3k.tepper.cmu.edu/gsiadoc/WP/2011-E34.pdf It was pretty badly misinterpreted by the "nice guys finish first" post, and we're heaping more layers of misinterpretation on top of that. For example, the study found that people who contributed to the group at the expense of outsiders (perceived as medium-dominance)…
太棒了，这真好。跟《自私的基因》（The Selfish Gene）第 12 章《Nice Guys Finish First》非常像（甚至可能是基于它写的？）
Yay, that's so nice. Very similar to (perhaps based of?) the 12th chapter _Nice Guys Finish First_ of the Selfish Gene.