…philosophers". After revising my approach he's rapidly becoming one of my favorite. Despite it's presentation, the Ethics is much better approached in a very non-linear fashion. edit: I also recommend Deleuze's Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. If you've read Deleuze's other work you may or may not be put off by this recommendation, but his work on Spinoza covers a lot of ground an is very readable.
If you’re interested in learning about monism, you’ll probably be interested in Spinoza. Deleuze provides excellent historical context and commentary in the book Spinoza: Practical Philosophy https://monoskop.org/images/d/d8/Deleuze_Gilles_Spinoza_Prac...
…much akin to Feynman, in his works which disentangle the works of previous philosophers: Nietzsche and Philosophy (1962), Kant's Critical Philosophy (1963), Proust and Signs (1964), Bergsonism (1966), Spinoza: Practical Philosophy (1981), Foucault (1986), The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (1988). The aforementioned, What Is Philosophy? is also extremely clearly written, and it is one of the best books ever to tackle in such a direct…
…Regardless, IMHO it's a good take. Reasonable people may disagree. In order, they're "Empiricism and Subjectivity," "Nietzsche and Philosophy," "Kant’s Critical Philosophy," "Proust and Signs," "Bergsonism," "Spinoza: Practical Philosophy," "Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature," "Francis Bacon: Logic of Sensation," and "Foucault." That is... a lot. IMHO, Nietzche, Spinoza, Foucault, and Kafka are the big ones, if you don't want to read like,…
……哲学家”。改变方法后，他迅速成了我最喜欢的哲学家之一。别看《伦理学》表面上的排版形式，其实非线性地去读效果要好得多。补充：我还推荐德勒兹的《Spinoza: Practical Philosophy》。如果你读过德勒兹的其他著作，这个推荐可能会劝退你，也可能不会，但他这本关于斯宾诺莎的书涵盖面很广，而且可读性极强。
…philosophers". After revising my approach he's rapidly becoming one of my favorite. Despite it's presentation, the Ethics is much better approached in a very non-linear fashion. edit: I also recommend Deleuze's Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. If you've read Deleuze's other work you may or may not be put off by this recommendation, but his work on Spinoza covers a lot of ground an is very readable.
如果你对一元论感兴趣，多半也会对斯宾诺莎感兴趣。德勒兹在《Spinoza: Practical Philosophy》一书中提供了极佳的历史背景和评注 https://monoskop.org/images/d/d8/Deleuze_Gilles_Spinoza_Prac...
If you’re interested in learning about monism, you’ll probably be interested in Spinoza. Deleuze provides excellent historical context and commentary in the book Spinoza: Practical Philosophy https://monoskop.org/images/d/d8/Deleuze_Gilles_Spinoza_Prac...
……非常神似费曼，特别是在他梳理前人哲学家思想的著作中：《尼采与哲学》（1962）、《康德的批判哲学》（1963）、《普鲁斯特与符号》（1964）、《柏格森主义》（1966）、《Spinoza: Practical Philosophy》（1981）、《福柯》（1986）、《褶子：莱布尼茨与巴洛克》（1988）。前面提到的《什么是哲学？》写得也极其透彻清晰，是有史以来以如此直接的方式切入该主题的最棒著作之一……
…much akin to Feynman, in his works which disentangle the works of previous philosophers: Nietzsche and Philosophy (1962), Kant's Critical Philosophy (1963), Proust and Signs (1964), Bergsonism (1966), Spinoza: Practical Philosophy (1981), Foucault (1986), The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (1988). The aforementioned, What Is Philosophy? is also extremely clearly written, and it is one of the best books ever to tackle in such a direct…
……不管怎样，依我看这是个很精辟的见解。各花入各眼，有不同看法很正常。按顺序分别是《经验主义与主体性》、《尼采与哲学》、《康德的批判哲学》、《普鲁斯特与符号》、《柏格森主义》、《Spinoza: Practical Philosophy》、《卡夫卡：走向少数文学》、《弗兰西斯·培根：感觉的逻辑》和《福柯》。这……量可真大。在我看来，如果你不想像那样通读的话，尼采、斯宾诺莎、福柯和卡夫卡是核心大头……
…Regardless, IMHO it's a good take. Reasonable people may disagree. In order, they're "Empiricism and Subjectivity," "Nietzsche and Philosophy," "Kant’s Critical Philosophy," "Proust and Signs," "Bergsonism," "Spinoza: Practical Philosophy," "Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature," "Francis Bacon: Logic of Sensation," and "Foucault." That is... a lot. IMHO, Nietzche, Spinoza, Foucault, and Kafka are the big ones, if you don't want to read like,…