表征与干预
Representing and intervening
Ian Hacking · 初版 1983 年
4人推荐
5位读者提及
7次提及
一本自然科学哲学导论，围绕科学实在论（scientific realism）这一核心主题展开。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
Representing and intervening
Ian Hacking · 初版 1983 年
一本自然科学哲学导论，围绕科学实在论（scientific realism）这一核心主题展开。
正在加载完整评论……
……除此之外，我也很想知道你觉得记者在哪方面做得好？编辑补充：从社会语言学的角度看，可以参考 Lakoff（那两位都算）。关于“事实”的表征，Ian Hacking 写过一本极好的书《Representing and Intervening》，里面探讨了库恩、波普尔、费耶阿本德等人的思想。
…Alongside this I'd like to know what you think journalists do well? Edit: For a sociolinguistic perspective, see Lakoff (both of them). On the representation of "fact," Ian Hacking has an excellent book, "Representing and Intervening" which looks at Kuhn, Popper, Feyerabend, etc.
……忙着应付考试过关，根本没法真正从学术角度深入思考他的理论。毕业那年夏天搬进新家，我在路边捡到了一堆别人扔掉的书。其中一本就是 Ian Hacking 的《Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Science》（表征与干预：科学哲学导论）。结果我一口气读完了，完全被他如此清晰梳理出的思想和哲学图景——也就是一套讨论议程——深深迷住了……
…and passing my classes to really give his work serious intellectual consideration. Moving into a new home the summer I graduated, I found a pile of books left on the curb. One of them was Ian Hacking's Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Science. I ended up tearing through it, utterly fascinated by the ideas and the philosophical landscape -- an agenda of discussion -- that he laid out so clearly,…
……这话题周围充满了噪音，因为要是那么说就是在撒谎。要真那么容易，ML 系统就不会被称为“黑盒”了！[5] 我也建议你去学点形而上学。比如 Ian Hacking 的《Representing and Intervening》就是一个很好的起点。单靠实验能理解的东西是有限的，戴森在回忆费米当年毙掉他的论文时就生动地说明了这一点[6]。普遍存在一种误解……
…of noise surrounding the topic, because that'd be a lie. If it were easy, ML systems wouldn't be "black boxes"![5] I would also encourage you to learn some meta physics. Something like Ian Hacking's representing and Intervening is a good start. There are limitations to what can be understand through experimentation alone, famously illustrated in Dyson's recounting of then Fermi rejected his paper[6]. There is a common misunderstanding…
……因果统计学，或者任何关于形而上学的书。一本讲因果统计的书会教你混杂变量和结构方程模型。形而上学方面，Ian Hacking 的《Representing and Intervening》是个不错的选择，还有波利亚著名的《How To Solve It》（虽然它属于元数学）。[0]（注意，戴森说的是“偏向了数学而不是物理”，但他实际指的是……
…statistics or any book on the subject of metaphysics. A causal statistics book will teach you this as you learn about confounding variables and structural equation modeling. For metaphysics Ian Hacking's "Representing and Intervening" is a good pick, as well as Polya's famous "How To Solve It" (though it is metamathematics). [0] (Mind you, Dyson says "went with the math instead of the physics" but what he's actually talking about…
……日心说模型显然理解得更透彻，整体上也更加精确。如果你想更深入了解这个话题，我强烈推荐播客“An Opinionated History of Math”以及 Ian Hacking 的《Representing and Intervening》这本书。这两者都非常通俗易懂。顺便提一句（FWIW），形而上学对这个问题的讨论非常多。> 我的第一个疑问是，很多人声称自己完全没有内心独白（internal monologue），所以……
…heliocentric model is clearly a better understanding and more accurate as a whole. If you want to dive deeper into this topic I'd highly recommend both the podcast "An Opinionated History of Math" and the book "Representing and Intervening" by Ian Hacking. They're both very approachable. FWIW, metaphysics talks about this quite a lot. > My first problem is that there are many people that claim that they have NO internal monologue So…
依然记得第一次对科学哲学产生兴趣时，偶然翻到他的书《Representing and Intervening》。读起来非常顺畅，极具启发性。作为卡特赖特或范·弗拉森其他著作的配套读物再合适不过了。
Still remember randomly coming across his book "Representing and Intervening" when I first got interested in philosophy of science. Pleasantly readable and illuminating. Great companion piece to other works by Cartwright or van Fraassen.