……课程。不错的参考资源有 Standish 报告：https://www.csus.edu/indiv/v/velianitis/161/chaosreport.pdf。此外，T. Capers Jones 写的任何东西都值得看。这些书里最全面的一本是这本：《Estimating Software Costs: Bringing Realism to Estimating》精装版 ISBN-13978-0071483001。许多人认为，软件开发危机的官方定调是 1968 年和 1969 年的那两次北约会议。参见 Wikipedia……
…Course. Good resources are the Standish Report: https://www.csus.edu/indiv/v/velianitis/161/chaosreport.pdf Also, anything that T. Capers Jones wrote. The most comprehensive one of these books is this: Estimating Software Costs: Bringing Realism to Estimating Hardcover ISBN-13978-0071483001 Many believe the official recognition of the crisis in developing software were the two NATO conferences in 1968 and 1969. See the Wikipedia…
……可能的方式。这跟声称 C 语言很烂、理由是可以用宏和 void* 乱搞一切差不多。评判编程语言应该看现实世界中的使用模式，而不是凭空臆想的标准。[1]《软件成本估算》（Jones 1998）和《使用 COCOMO II 进行软件成本估算》（Boehm 2000）“……面向对象编程并非万灵药……”虽然确实有人鼓吹过 OOP 是万灵药，但这大多……
…possible way. This is not much different to claiming C is bad because you can use macros and void* for everything. The languages should be compared by real-world use patterns, not dreamed up criteria. [1] Estimating Software Costs (Jones 1998) and Software Cost Estimation with Cocomo II (Boehm 2000) "[...]that object-oriented programming is no panacea[...]" While it is true that some have argued for OOP as panacea, this is mostly…
……课程。不错的参考资源有 Standish 报告：https://www.csus.edu/indiv/v/velianitis/161/chaosreport.pdf。此外，T. Capers Jones 写的任何东西都值得看。这些书里最全面的一本是这本：《Estimating Software Costs: Bringing Realism to Estimating》精装版 ISBN-13978-0071483001。许多人认为，软件开发危机的官方定调是 1968 年和 1969 年的那两次北约会议。参见 Wikipedia……
…Course. Good resources are the Standish Report: https://www.csus.edu/indiv/v/velianitis/161/chaosreport.pdf Also, anything that T. Capers Jones wrote. The most comprehensive one of these books is this: Estimating Software Costs: Bringing Realism to Estimating Hardcover ISBN-13978-0071483001 Many believe the official recognition of the crisis in developing software were the two NATO conferences in 1968 and 1969. See the Wikipedia…
……可能的方式。这跟声称 C 语言很烂、理由是可以用宏和 void* 乱搞一切差不多。评判编程语言应该看现实世界中的使用模式，而不是凭空臆想的标准。[1]《软件成本估算》（Jones 1998）和《使用 COCOMO II 进行软件成本估算》（Boehm 2000）“……面向对象编程并非万灵药……”虽然确实有人鼓吹过 OOP 是万灵药，但这大多……
…possible way. This is not much different to claiming C is bad because you can use macros and void* for everything. The languages should be compared by real-world use patterns, not dreamed up criteria. [1] Estimating Software Costs (Jones 1998) and Software Cost Estimation with Cocomo II (Boehm 2000) "[...]that object-oriented programming is no panacea[...]" While it is true that some have argued for OOP as panacea, this is mostly…