让人人得以武装
That every man be armed
Stephen P. Halbrook · 初版 1984 年
2人推荐
6位读者提及
8次提及
“Halbrook 1984年出版著作的修订更新版，探讨了Second Amendment以及个人持有和佩带武器的权利”——由出版商提供。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
That every man be armed
Stephen P. Halbrook · 初版 1984 年
“Halbrook 1984年出版著作的修订更新版，探讨了Second Amendment以及个人持有和佩带武器的权利”——由出版商提供。
正在加载完整评论……
……人人平等——这些可能只是400年前某个神志不清、疯疯癫癫的老头写下的，他只是想保住自己的奴隶财产罢了。”是的，看来你确实是这么想的。你得去补补功课了，我建议先读斯蒂芬·P·哈尔布鲁克（Stephen P. Halbrook）的《人皆持枪：一项宪法权利的演变》（That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right）。这是最高法院超级多数派做出这项裁决并强加给纽约以及最终其余6个州的原始源头（Ur sources）之一……
…equal - they might have been written by some senile, crazy old man who just wanted to maintain his enslaved properties 400 years ago." Yes, it seems you are. You have some reading to do, I'd start with That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right by Stephen P. Halbrook. One of the Ur sources that the Supreme Court supermajority used to find this decision and enforce on New York and ultimate the 6 other…
……历史背景（根据 SCOTUSBlog 文章的扩充版，这可以追溯到12世纪）。你可以试着读读判决书，或者海勒案（Heller），但一直以来的权威奠基之作是斯蒂芬·P·哈尔布鲁克的《人皆持枪：一项宪法权利的演变》（That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right）。
…historical context (which per an expanded version of the SCOTUSBlog article goes back to the 12th Century). You could try reading the decision, or Heller, but the go-to foundational book has long been That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right by Stephen P. Halbrook.
……导致20世纪的法理学极为混乱，因为最高法院大法官们（Supremes）在选择性地适用它（关于第二修正案，最近的是在麦克唐纳案 McDonald 中）。有一本老（1984年）但极其出色的书涵盖了这部分内容，那就是《人皆持枪》（That Every Man Be Armed）：http://www.amazon.com/That-Every-Man-Armed-Constitutional/dp... 书的开头以及我记得的大部分篇幅都在讲第二修正案时期，这有助于了解为什么我们现在的警察部队……
…resulting in really messy jurisprudence in the 20th as the Supremes have selectively applied it (for the 2nd, in McDonald very recently). An old (1984) but excellent book that includes coverage of this is That Every Man Be Armed: http://www.amazon.com/That-Every-Man-Armed-Constitutional/dp... The beginning and as I recall bulk of the book is on the 2nd Amendment period, and that's useful for learning why our current police forces…
> 你得去补补功课了，我建议先读斯蒂芬·P·哈尔布鲁克写的《人皆持枪：一项宪法权利的演变》（That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right）。多读几本跟当年写第二修正案那帮人同一鼻孔出气的人写的书，不过是用循环论证来证明你自己的观点罢了，这根本只能……
> You have some reading to do, I'd start with That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right by Stephen P. Halbrook. Reading more books written by the same type of people who wrote the 2nd is just using circular logic to prove your point and it only serves…
刚拿到哈尔布鲁克开创性的《人皆持枪》（That Every Man Be Armed）修订更新版，在第69-70页，他证实了在有条件批准宪法之前，13个州中有7个州发表声明承认了拥枪权（RKBA），而没有发表声明的2个州“后来要求保护……”
Just got my revised and updated edition of Halbrook's groundbreaking That Every Man Be Armed, and on pages 69-70 he confirms that prior to the conditional ratification of the Constitution, 7 of the 13 states had declarations acknowledging the RKBA, and 2 that didn't "later demanded protection…
……（理查德·亨利·李，大陆会议弗吉尼亚代表、《独立宣言》发起人，以及通过《权利法案》的第一届参议院成员。）“其伟大的目标在于使人人皆可持械……凡有能力者皆可拥有枪支。”（帕特里克·亨利，在弗吉尼亚州批准宪法代表大会上的发言。）然而你却宣称“2A（第二修正案）绝对不是关于个人权利的。没有哪个建国先父……
…(Richard Henry Lee, Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress, initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights.) "The great object is that every man be armed . . . Everyone who is able may have a gun." (Patrick Henry, in the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the Constitution.) Yet you claim "2A is absolutely not about individual rights. No Founder…