论文字学
Of grammatology
Jacques Derrida · 初版 1976 年
2人推荐
9位读者提及
9次提及
Jacques Derrida关于deconstruction、phenomenology、psychoanalysis和structuralism的革命性理论于20世纪60年代首次提出，永远改变了欧美批评界的面貌。De la grammatologie中的思想在包括文学、哲学和人文学科学生在内的知识界引发了激烈讨论，促使这些学生就本学科提出此前被视为不合时宜的问题。三十年后，Derrida著作的巨大影响力依然在激荡争议，这在一定程度上得益于Gayatri Spivak的译本……
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……了解这个主题，从这里入门挺不错的（按先后顺序）：费尔迪南·德·索绪尔的《普通语言学教程》http://books.google.com/books?id=B0eB8mvov6wC&printsec=f...，雅克·德里达的《论文字学》http://www.mohamedrabeea.com/books/book1_3997.pdf，还有，当作消遣随便看看的……雅克·德里达的《延异》http://hydra.humanities.uci.edu/derrida/diff.html
…learning about the subject, here's a good place to start (in order): Ferdinand de Saussure, Course in General Linguistics http://books.google.com/books?id=B0eB8mvov6wC&printsec=f... Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology http://www.mohamedrabeea.com/books/book1_3997.pdf and, for fun... Jacques Derrida, Differànce http://hydra.humanities.uci.edu/derrida/diff.html
我不知道算不算‘改变人生’，但我读过最好的书有：路德维希·维特根斯坦的《逻辑哲学论》、马丁·海德格尔的《存在与时间》、雅克·德里达的《论文字学》、雅克·德里达的《书写与差异》、菲利普·K·迪克的《火星人分歧》、拉里·尼文的《环形世界》、乔·霍尔德曼的《千年战争》、弗朗茨·卡夫卡的《变形记》……
I don't know about 'life-changing' but the best books I ever read were: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (Ludwig Wittgenstein) Being and Time (Martin Heidegger) Of Grammatology (Jacques Derrida) Writing and Difference (Jacques Derrida) Martian Timeslip (Philip K. Dick) Ringworld (Larry Niven) The Forever War (Joe Haldeman) The Metamorphosis (Franz…
……据我所知好几次被评为最烂学术作家之一（要是我没记错的话，她还当过一届 MLA 主席）。德勒兹和加塔利是出了名的不知所云，德里达也是（他的《论文字学》由出了名晦涩的斯皮瓦克翻译，更是‘名震天下’），而且我个人觉得阿伦特的书难读得要死。顺便说一句，很多这类后现代作者都源自欧洲大陆哲学的语言学……
…been voted one of the worst academic writers several times to my knowledge (she was president of MLA for a term, too, if I'm not mistaken). Deleuze and Guatarri are famously incoherent, Derrida as well (Of Grammatology being famously translated by the famously vague Spivak), and personally I find Arendt incredibly difficult to follow. FWIW, a lot of these postmodern authors come from the Continental tradition's linguistic…
我早在 95 年就读过他的评论了，刚才又把关于德里达的部分重读了一遍。（我对福柯没什么兴趣，所以跳过了看福柯的那段。）乔姆斯基声称他发现《论文字学》里全都是“可悲的误读”。遗憾的是，他根本懒得列出来具体误读了什么——而且说来奇怪，据我所知，其他人也从来没有列出过。我只知道有一份出版物……
I did read his comments back in '95, and I re-read the comments about Derrida now. (I am not particularly interested in Foucault, so I skipped his reading of him.) Chomsky claims to have found "Of Grammatology" full of "pathetic misreadings." Unfortunately, he doesn't take the time to outline what these might be-- and oddly enough, neither does anybody else, to my knowledge. I know of only one publication…
我不懂你凭啥说二十世纪中叶的法国作家写书都不引用他。《论文字学》作为解构主义的奠基之作，索引里光是提到他的地方就有 28 处，这还没算导言部分呢。他是后结构主义的主要影响源之一，这也是学界普遍公认的事实。
I don't know why you'd say French writers in the mid-twentieth century wrote books without citing him. Of Grammatology, the ur-text of deconstruction, has 28 references for him in the index, and that's not including the introduction. He's a major influence on post-structuralism and is generally accepted as such.
……塑造你的意识形态。我觉得看尼采的话读《论道德的谱系》，看马克思的话读《德意志意识形态》。关于解构主义的起源，我近期反正是不打算去啃《论文字学》了，不过你是我听过第一个主张应该把功劳归给海德格尔的人，所以麻烦你，你懂的，给出你的文献出处。
…shape your ideology. I think the text to look at for N. is "On The Genealogy of Morals" and the text for Marx is "The German Ideology". Regarding the provenance of deconstruction. I'm not about to read "Of Grammatology" any time soon but you are the first person I've heard to assert the Heidegger should be given credit so you need to, you know, cite your source please.