
Google Hacks
Tara Calishain、Rael Dornfest · 初版 2003 年
1人推荐
3位读者提及
4次提及
互联网让海量信息触手可及,而你所需要的,仅仅是掌握搜寻之法。Google 便是你的终极检索工具——这一搜索引擎索引了逾24亿个网页,支持30多种语言,每天承载超过1.5亿次搜索。你对 Google 了解得越深,就越能高效地从网络中提取数据。你手头早已掌握了一系列技巧——有些来自实践经验,有些来自与他人的探讨交流,有些则源自单纯的反复试错——但你始终在探寻更佳的搜索策略。这是你骨子里的“黑客”精神在作祟:绝不
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……框里,而不是在搜索完成后的后处理步骤。或者如何在不启用 JavaScript 的情况下做到这一点。以前这种事轻而易举。很久以前我买过一本叫《Google Hacks》[1]的书。里面有各种教你如何搜得更好的绝妙技巧。比如上面有对接 Google 的 Perl 和 Python 脚本。现在要是跑这种脚本,估计你的 IP 地址直接就被封了(我不……
…box, and not as a post processing step after a search is completed. Or how to do that without JavaScript enabled. That kind of thing was easily possible before. A long time ago I bought a book called Google Hacks[1]. It had all sorts of good tips on how to search better. E.g there were Perl and Python scripts to interface with Google. Now, running scripts like that will probably get your IP address banned (I don't…
……并不难,但还记得有那么几年,只要你能正确使用 + 号,大家就会觉得你是搜索大神,或者那时候居然有人出书教人怎么用 Google 搜索吗?https://www.amazon.com/Google-Hacks-Finding-Worlds-Informati...
…isn't hard, but remember those few years when people would think you're a search guru because you could use + correctly, or when people sold books about how to use Google search? https://www.amazon.com/Google-Hacks-Finding-Worlds-Informati...
……几点想法:1)非常棒的信息!2)感觉这世界挺需要一本像 Joe Celko 的《SQL For Smarties》那样针对搜索引擎的书。是的,现在确实已经有这类书了,最出名的当属 O'Reilly 出版的由 Rael Dornfest、Paul Bausch、Tara Calishain 写的《Google Hacks》——但我认为大家依然需要一本涵盖更多搜索引擎和搜索技巧的书。上面那个网页会是一个很好的切入点,用来……
…thoughts: 1) Great information! 2) It seems like the world could use a book like Joe Celko's "SQL For Smarties", but for search engines. Yes, there are such books already, most notably O'Reilly's "Google Hacks" by Rael Dornfest, Paul Bausch, Tara Calishain -- but I think the world could still use a book covering more search engines and search techniques. The above web page would be a great starting point to…
而 DuckDuckGo 却能返回真正符合你搜索的内容。曾经 Google 是个非常酷的搜索引擎。甚至有整本整本的书教你如何聪明地使用它。比如《Google Hacks 100 Industrial-Strength Tips & Tools》https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/google-hacks/0596004478... 现在倒好,根本没办法精准限定搜索条件了。双引号屁用没有。加上“&tbs=li:1”……
Whereas duckduckgo will return stuff that actually matches your search. One upon a time Google was a really cool search engine. Entire books were written about how to use it wisely. E.g. Google Hacks 100 Industrial-Strength Tips & Tools https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/google-hacks/0596004478... Now, it's impossible to properly qualify searches. Quotes don't mean shit. Appending "&tbs=li:1"…