错引耶稣
Misquoting Jesus
Bart D. Ehrman · 初版 2005 年
4人推荐
8位读者提及
8次提及
近 1500 年来，《New Testament》手抄本全靠手工抄写——在互有竞争的手抄本版本中，错误与蓄意篡改比比皆是。宗教与圣经学者 Bart Ehrman 提出了一个发人深省的论点：我们在 Jesus 的神性、Trinity 以及《Bible》自身神圣起源方面普遍持有的许多信仰，实际上都是抄写员有意或无意改动的结果。在这本扣人心弦、引人入胜的著作中，Ehrman 指出了在我们现存最早的手稿中是在何处以及为何发生改动的，首次解释了这些手稿
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
顺便提一句，想看一本讨论现代圣经演变的好书，你该读读 Bart D. Ehrman 的《Misquoting Jesus》（制造耶稣）。
as an aside, for a great book discussing the evolution of the current bible, you should read Misquoting Jesus by Bart D. Ehram
……能改变我的生活，减少分心，也许做事效率能更高。4. 《The Vital Question》——让我意识到，人类以及复杂细胞生物光是能够存在，本身就是一件多么幸运的事。5. 《Misquoting Jesus》（以及 Ehrman 的其他所有书）——为我提供了弹药话术，专门用来应付生活中任何/所有狂热的基督徒。圣经里的故事，跟当年流传下来的故事根本差了十万八千里……
…can change my life to live with less distractions and maybe do thinks more efficently 4. The Vital Question - Made me realize how lucky we as humans and complex cellular beings are to even exist. 5. Misquoting Jesus (and all of Ehrman's other books) - Gave me talking points I use against any/all overzealous Christians in my life. The stories of the bible are not remotely close to the stories that where handed down…
> 基于证据的方法，用圣经来解释圣经本身，正如它最初被设计的那样。我听不懂这是什么意思。但我确实认为《Misquoting Jesus》是我读过的较好的圣经批判类书籍之一，有兴趣的人我都推荐去读。你的推荐让我想起了这本书。
> evidence based approach that uses the Bible to interpret itself as it was designed to do I don't understand what that means. But I do think Misquoting Jesus is one of the better biblical criticism books I've read, and can recommend it for interested folks. Your recommendation reminded me of that.
Bart D. Ehrman 写的《Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why》。这本书非常值得一读，讲的是早期抄写员的做法，以及《新约》不同手抄本翻译中已知的各种问题。
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why by Bart D. Ehrman. It’s a great read about early scribe practices and known problems with different manuscript translations in the New Testament.
……有责任去感化转化他们。但我真的很难对那些甘愿把道德或政治/生活抉择建立在像《圣经》这种荒谬玩意上（解释详见 http://www.amazon.com/Misquoting-Jesus-Story-Behind-Changed/... ）、或是建立在毫无事实依据的逻辑漏洞上的人产生共鸣。他们的认知论（epistemology）跟我实在差得太远了。
…duty to convert them. But I also have a hard time really relating to anyone who is willing to base their morality or political/life decisions on such silly things as the Bible (see http://www.amazon.com/Misquoting-Jesus-Story-Behind-Changed/... for explanation) or logically unsound principles with no factual evidence. Their epistemology is just too different from mine.
如果你读过 Bart Ehrman 的《Misquoting Jesus》，书中论证了相较于同时期的其他宗教（包括孕育出它的犹太教传统），早期基督教更把书写和抄写放在极其核心的位置。当然……
If you read Misquoting Jesus by Bart Ehrman, makes the case that writing and copying were much more central to early Christianity than other religions of the time, including the Jewish tradition out of which it sprung. Certainly…