正义
Justice
Michael J. Sandel · 初版 2009 年
8人推荐
12位读者提及
12次提及
为什么值得读
- 从哲学角度严密论证平等与权利
- 清晰对比功利主义与康德主义伦理观
- 启发读者深思各项社会政策背后的应得问题
Michael Sandel对正义的内涵展开了一场深邃而富有诗意的探索。他以全新且极具启发性的视角，审视了诸多为人熟知的争议性话题，包括affirmative action、同性婚姻、医生协助自杀、堕胎、国民服役、爱国主义与异见，以及市场的道德边界。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
我觉得这本书在从哲学角度论证平等这方面，对我来说讲得相当好：http://www.amazon.co.uk/Justice-Whats-Right-Thing-Do/dp/0141...
I think this book did a pretty good job for me of justifying equality from a philosophical perspective: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Justice-Whats-Right-Thing-Do/dp/0141...
……权利。2. 衡量幸福是对人类体验的一种轻视（例如：得给多少人发一台 iPhone，才能把折磨并暗杀一个孩子合理化？）。如果想了解更多，不妨读读 Michael Sandel 写的《Justice》（公正）。
…rights. 2. Measuring happiness is a trivialization of human experience (ex. How many people would need to be given an iPhone in order to justify the torturing an assassination of a child?). Try reading Justice by Michael Sandel if you want to learn more.
《不合理的理性》（The Upside of Irrationality），Ariely；《枪炮、病菌与钢铁》（Guns, Germs, and Steel），Jared Diamond；《影响力》（Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion），Cialdini；《公正：该如何做是好？》（Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do），Sandel；《QED》，Feynman；费曼物理学讲义全套；《创业维艰》（The Hard Thing About Hard Things），Horowitz；《历史绪论》（Al-Muqaddimah），Ibn Khaldun
The upside of irrationality. Ariely Germs guns and steel. Jared Diamond Influence, the psychology of persuasion. Cialdini Justice: what's the right thing to do. Sandel QED. Fyenman All of Feynman lectures on physics The hard thing about hard things. Horowitz Al muqqadimah. Ibn khaldun
……功利主义提倡做出让最多人获益的决策。而康德主义则强调人应该始终被尊严和尊重相待。Michael Sandel 的《Justice》是这个主题的极佳入门读物。[1] https://www.amazon.com/Justice-Whats-Right-Thing-Do/dp/03745...
…Utilitarianism promotes decisions that benefits the greatest number of people. Whereas, kantianism focuses on the idea that people should be always treated with dignity and respect. Michael Sandel's book "Justice" is a great introduction to the topic. [1] https://www.amazon.com/Justice-Whats-Right-Thing-Do/dp/03745...
……优先录取少数族裔，以推进其提高少数族裔参政代表性的使命。或者它可能想修正考试成绩差距，亦或是补偿过去的过错。Sandel 的《Justice》让我开阔了眼界，促使我进一步思考各种社会议题中“谁应得什么”的问题。
…preferentially admit minorities to advance its mission of increasing minoirty representation in politics. Or it might want to correct for the testing gap, or compensate for past wrongs. Sandel's book "Justice" opened my eyes a little bit to thinking more about "who deserves what" in a variety of social issues.
确实适用，但可能并不总是出于显而易见的原因。我真心鼓励大家都去看看 Michael Sandel 在哈佛大学讲的政治哲学公开课（课名就叫《Justice》）。YouTube 上就有。
It really does apply, but maybe not always for obvious reasons. I really would encourage everyone to watch Michael Sandel's political philosophy lectures (titled "Justice") at Harvard University. It's available on Youtube.