……以及虚假信息（参见《Merchants of Doubt》），在她写的《PLATE TECTONICS: The Insiders’ History of the Modern Theory of the Earth》和《The Rejection of Continental Drift》，以及就该主题撰写的另外几篇文章中，记录了确立这一概念所经历的长达四个世纪的鏖战。https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/naomi-oreskes/pla... http://www.worldcat.org/title/rejection-of-continental-drift...
…and disinformation (see Merchants of Doubt) documents the four-century-long battle to establish the concept in her books PLATE TECTONICS: The Insiders’ History of the Modern Theory of the Earth and The Rejection of Continental Drift, along with several further articles on the topic. https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/naomi-oreskes/pla... http://www.worldcat.org/title/rejection-of-continental-drift...
……科学家往往会对与伪科学挂钩的假说表现得不屑一顾，哪怕那个更具体的科学问题本身完全合情合理。这让我想起历史上那些出于本能的抵触反应，比如对大陆漂移说（Continental drift）的排斥（也就是说大方向的 idea 是对的，但机制还没完全搞清楚）。我不是说量子假说一定是对的，只是说我们不要过早下定论。
…scientists to react dismissively to hypotheses associated with pseudoscience, even when the narrower scientific question is perfectly legitimate. Reminds me of the visceral reactions in history, like the Rejection of Continental drift (i.e. high level idea was right, but mechanisms hadn't been pinned down yet). Not claiming that the quantum hypothesis is right, just saying we didn't jump to conclusions.
……以及虚假信息（参见《Merchants of Doubt》），在她写的《PLATE TECTONICS: The Insiders’ History of the Modern Theory of the Earth》和《The Rejection of Continental Drift》，以及就该主题撰写的另外几篇文章中，记录了确立这一概念所经历的长达四个世纪的鏖战。https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/naomi-oreskes/pla... http://www.worldcat.org/title/rejection-of-continental-drift...
…and disinformation (see Merchants of Doubt) documents the four-century-long battle to establish the concept in her books PLATE TECTONICS: The Insiders’ History of the Modern Theory of the Earth and The Rejection of Continental Drift, along with several further articles on the topic. https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/naomi-oreskes/pla... http://www.worldcat.org/title/rejection-of-continental-drift...
……科学家往往会对与伪科学挂钩的假说表现得不屑一顾，哪怕那个更具体的科学问题本身完全合情合理。这让我想起历史上那些出于本能的抵触反应，比如对大陆漂移说（Continental drift）的排斥（也就是说大方向的 idea 是对的，但机制还没完全搞清楚）。我不是说量子假说一定是对的，只是说我们不要过早下定论。
…scientists to react dismissively to hypotheses associated with pseudoscience, even when the narrower scientific question is perfectly legitimate. Reminds me of the visceral reactions in history, like the Rejection of Continental drift (i.e. high level idea was right, but mechanisms hadn't been pinned down yet). Not claiming that the quantum hypothesis is right, just saying we didn't jump to conclusions.