《思考》封面

思考

Think

Simon Blackburn · 初版 1999 年

2人推荐
3位读者提及
3次提及

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • > 宗教(就像哲学和迷信一样) 这里面有一个东西跟其他两个可不是一回事。如果你之前没学过哲学,这本书(西蒙·布莱克本写的《思考》[Think])是一本读起来极度顺畅的入门书:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think:_A_Compelling_Introducti... 它是那种……

    > Religion (like philosophy and superstition) One of these things is not like the others. This book ("Think" by Simon Blackburn) is a wonderfully readable introduction to the subject if you haven't studied philosophy before: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think:_A_Compelling_Introducti... It's one of the books…

  • ……有一些非常棒的小册子,适合想要快速切入某个主题的人。另外几本书:B·罗素的《哲学问题》(OUP 出版,虽老但经典的通识入门);西蒙·布莱克本的《思考》(牛津出版,很棒的通识入门);蒂姆·克兰的《机械心智》(企鹅出版,心灵哲学的绝佳入门);A·J·艾耶尔的《语言、真理与逻辑》(企鹅出版,虽老但经典);D·休谟的《人类理解研究》……

    …have some really good booklets if you want quick ways to jump into a topic. A few other books: B Russell The Problems of Philosophy. OUP (dated, but a classic general introduction) Simon Blackburn Think. Oxford (nice general introduction) Tim Crane The Mechanical Mind. Penguin (Nice introduction to phil of mind) A J Ayer Language, Truth, and Logic. Penguin (dated, but a classic) D Hume Enquiries T…

  • 我觉得这得看工作文化吧?我工作过以及/或者做过咨询的地方,基本上大家都不怕言辞大胆。像西蒙·布莱克本的《思考》这类书,我评论起来完全没压力。它们对底层主题的探讨其实挺浅显的,但(作为哲学)它们是被包装成理性探讨的。(至于到底是不是,那就是另……

    I guess it depends on workplace culture? I have worked and/or consulted at places where I would not have been (in general) afraid to be bold. Books like "Think" by Simon Blackburn don't bother me to comment on. They are pretty light treatments of the underlying topics, but (as philosophy), they are framed as rational discourses. (Whether they are or not is a…

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助