火与怒
Fire And Fury
Michael Wolff · 初版 2018 年
1人推荐
5位读者提及
6次提及
这本由 Michael Wolff 于 2018 年出版的著作，详尽披露了美国总统 Donald Trump、其 2016 年总统竞选团队以及白宫幕僚的言行举止（以及内部仇怨）。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
Fire And Fury
Michael Wolff · 初版 2018 年
这本由 Michael Wolff 于 2018 年出版的著作，详尽披露了美国总统 Donald Trump、其 2016 年总统竞选团队以及白宫幕僚的言行举止（以及内部仇怨）。
正在加载完整评论……
……Steven Pinker 2018 年写的《当下的启蒙》（Enlightenment Now）挺不错的，尽管他对真正的启蒙时代其实没那么了解。Lawrence Burns 讲自动驾驶的《Autonomy》（2018）非常值得一读。Michael Wolff 的《火与怒》（Fire and Fury）写特朗普政府内部那个极其诡异的世界写得很好。
…Enlightenment Now (2018) by Steven Pinker is pretty good, even if he doesn't know that much about the actual enlightenment. Autonomy (2018) by Lawrence Burns about self-driving cars is well worth a read. Fire and Fury by Michael Wolff is good about the very strange world inside the Trump administration.
《火与怒》（Fire and Fury）第一章就声称，特朗普和几乎所有其他相关人员都以为他赢不了，而且特朗普本人根本不想赢。我不是说这本书就靠谱，但你能发现……
Fire and Fury asserts in the first chapter that Trump and just about everyone else involved thought he wouldn’t win, and that Trump himself didn’t want to win. I’m not saying that book is reliable, but you can find…
……“他根本不像正常人那样处理信息。他不读书，甚至连粗略翻翻都不看。有人认为，从实际角度来说，他充其量就是个半文盲。”——Michael Wolff，《火与怒》（Fire and Fury）https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/01/america...
…“He didn’t process information in any conventional sense. He didn’t read. He didn’t really even skim. Some believed that for all practical purposes he was no more than semi-literate.” ~ Michael Wolff, Fire and Fury https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/01/america...
《火与怒》（Fire and Fury）基本上也纯属瞎编。作者根本没有任何内幕渠道，向来以信口胡诌闻名，而且他自己都承认过_在这本书里_胡编乱造了。但有些人还是继续把它当成……
Fire and Fury is also almost entirely fiction. The author had no access whatsoever, is known for just making shit up, and has admitted that he made shit up _in this particular book_. Yet some people continue to treat…
……我唯一能想到的争议领域，涉及那些商业出版社出版的、号称能“独家一窥”某位名人生活的书籍（比如名人传记，或者像《火与怒》（Fire and Fury）这类的书）。在这种情况下确实存在独创内容，如果被全盘披露，作者/出版社的销量大概率会受到影响。
…The only problem area I can think of involves books published by commercial publishers which promise 'exclusive peek' into the life of some famous person (think biographies of celebrities or books like Fire and Fury). In that kind of case there is indeed original content, and revealing it in detail will arguably mean less sales for the authors/publishers.
……“用 Louis CK 的风格给我讲几个笑话”。这会让我去看 Louis CK 喜剧特辑的意愿降低吗？（相比之下，如果我让 ChatGPT 总结像《火与怒》（Fire and Fury）这种书里的核心内幕爆料，那大概率会让我打消买书的念头，因为我买书本来就是冲着里面的独家新信息去的，结果 ChatGPT 已经全剧透给我了。）
…to "tell me some jokes in the style of Louis CK". Would that make me less likely to stream a Louis CK comedy special? (By contrast, if I ask ChatGPT to summarize the key revelations from a book like Fire and Fury, that probably would make me less likely to buy the book, because if I buy the book it'd be for the novel information contained in it, but ChatGPT already divulged it to me.)