《思考》封面

思考

Think

作者未知

3人推荐
4位读者提及
4次提及

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • 我觉得在读这里推荐的大部头之前,先读一本好的入门书是个好主意。作为入门书,西蒙·布莱克本的《思考:引人入胜的哲学入门》(Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy)挺不错的。篇幅不长,涵盖了重要主题以及哲学家们对它们的思考。之后你就可以进阶去读经典了。

    I think having a good introduction before reading the big books suggested here is a good idea. For an introductory book, Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy is pretty good. It's short, and covers the important topics and how philosophers thought about them. You can then move on to reading the classics.

  • 随便一本哲学入门书都行,比如 Simon Blackburn 的《思考:引人入胜的哲学入门》(Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy)。

    Any intro to philosophy book, e.g. "Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy" by Simon Blackburn

  • 几周前我也有同样的疑问,于是去了 r/philosophy 板块。他们推荐从 Blackburn 的《思考:引人入胜的哲学入门》(Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy)开始读起。

    I had the same question a few weeks ago so I went on r/philosophy. They recommend starting with Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy by Blackburn

  • ……通篇基调都是“看这有多离谱”。我本来期待的是一种更加客观、不动声色的环境描写,让所有那种“不对劲感”悄悄在读者心头滋生。读了 Simon Blackburn 的《思考:引人入胜的哲学入门》(Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy),体验并不好。写得是不错,读起来也挺顺,但它解释主题的方式就是不行。太啰嗦了,在各个哲学家之间反复横跳……

    …the overall mood is "look at how wrong this is". I was expecting a more detached and unemotional description of the setting, where all the "wrongness" would be creeping up in back of the reader's mind. Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy, Simon Blackburn. Not enjoying it. It is a well written book, and reads easilly, but it's way of explaining the themes is just not good. It's long-winded, goes back and forth between the philosophers…

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助