论道德的谱系
A genealogy of morals
Friedrich Nietzsche · 初版 1887 年
17人推荐
38位读者提及
44次提及
为什么值得读
- 读者公认尼采思想最深刻完备的作品之一
- 对惩罚起源与古代残酷现象的透彻剖析
- 借助古罗马意象重现前宗教时期的自然伦理
通过三篇力透纸背的论文探讨了人性最核心的问题。在书中，Nietzsche 剖析了“好”、“坏”和“恶”的基本概念，进而考察了人类如何从野蛮生灵转变为能够感受悔恨、遗憾、怜悯与同情的文明存在，但在此过程中却扼杀了本能与自由。Nietzsche 发问：为何贫困、谦卑和贞洁等美德会成为宗教的核心，即便它们否定了生命力和生命本身？这部精辟且极具挑衅性的辩论文敢于揭露令人不安的真相，提供了令人震惊的深刻见解……
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……关于社会如何最理想运转的理论。尼采的伟大洞见在于，在构建道德方面，内在考量起的作用远大于外在考量。具体可以参考《论道德的谱系》和《善恶的彼岸》。尼采在面对某种道德时，首先问的永远是：这里活跃着什么样的“本能”？这种伦理是源于力量与自信的充盈泛滥，……
…theory about how society functions best. It was Nietzsche's great insight that internal considerations play a much larger role in constructing morality than external considerations. See, in particular, _On the Genealogy of Morals_ and _Beyond Good and Evil_. Nietzsche's first questions on encountering a morality were always: what "instincts" are active here? Does this ethic arise from a overwelling of strength and confidence,…
阿尔贝·加缪的《西西弗神话》通俗好读，堪称现代虚无主义思想的经典之作。我也推荐尼采的《道德的谱系》。虽然这不是他最出名的作品，但被普遍公认为是他最好的作品。
The Myth of Sisyphus by Albert Camus is extremely readable and a classic of modern nihilistic thought. I'd also recommend Nietzsche's The Genealogy of Morals. It's not his most famous work, but it's pretty widely acclaimed as his best.
《论道德的谱系》是尼采写过的所有作品里逻辑最连贯、最好懂，而且在我看来（IMHO）也是跟我们这个时代最息息相关的一部作品。
'On the Genealogy of Morals' was the most coherent, accessible, and IMHO relevant text to out times, that Nietzsche ever produced.
…球滚得更快）：《伊斯梅尔》（丹尼尔·奎恩）、《1984》（乔治·奥威尔）、《美丽新世界》（阿道司·赫胥黎）、《哥德尔、艾舍尔、巴赫》（侯世达）、《理想国》[重点看“洞穴寓言”]（柏拉图）、《道德的谱系》（弗里德里希·尼采）、《现实的社会构建》（彼得·伯格、托马斯·卢克曼）、《逻辑哲学论》（维特根斯坦）、《播撒》[重点看“药”]（雅克·德里达）、《…
…ball rolling faster): Ishmael (Daniel Quinn) 1984 (George Orwell) Brave New World (Aldous Huxley) Godel, Escher, Bach (Douglas Hofstadter) The Republic [imp. "the allegory of the cave"] (Plato) The Genealogy of Morals (Friedrich Nietzsche) The Social Construction of Reality (Peter L. Berger, Thomas Luckmann) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (L. Wittgenstein) Dissemination [imp. "The Pharmakon"] (Jacques Derrida) The…
……某些东西来驳斥它。说实话，很多人确实认同，就像……这是基础性的。大卫·哈维（David Harvey）在这方面能帮上忙，他虽说并不总是完美，但也比大多数人强。在那之后，我个人的做法是去读了尼采的《论道德的谱系》。然后是福柯的《规训与惩罚》。再然后是德勒兹的作品。要想真正读懂《反俄狄浦斯》，我对弗洛伊德的涉猎还不够深，不过《文明及其不满》还是很值得一读的。……
…something to reject it. Many do agree, to be clear, just like... it's foundational. David Harvey can help there, he's not always perfect but he's better than most. From there, what I personally did was read On the Genealogy of Morals by Nietzsche. Then Discipline and Punish by Foucault. Then the Deleuze. I am less well read with Freud than I should be to truly engage with Anti-Oedipus, but Civilization and its Discontents is worthwhile.…
……推动者（movers）也太简单粗暴了，根本支撑不起她关于伦理学的一些观点。约翰·斯图尔特·密尔的《功利主义》是我政治哲学课上的第一本必读读物，至今仍是我的最爱。尼采的《论道德的谱系》促使我反思：自己一直以来坚守的那些价值观，真的有那么大价值吗？埃莉诺·罗施（Eleanor Rosch）关于基本范畴和原型理论的研究（要是没有这项研究，莱考夫的《女人、火与危险事物》……
…movers is way too simplistic to ground some of her views on ethics. John Stuart Mill's "Utilitarianism" was my first assigned reading in a political philosophy class, and remains my favorite. Nietzsche's On the Genealogy of Morals prompted me to question whether the values I had always held were really all that valuable. Eleanor Rosch's work on basic categories and prototype theory (without which Lakoff's Women, Fire, and Dangerous…