《铁证待判》封面

铁证待判

Evidence that demands a verdict

Josh McDowell · 初版 1972 年

3人推荐
4位读者提及
5次提及

基督教可信吗?对作为上帝之子的耶稣基督的信仰是否有其理智基础?几个世纪以来的学者,以及千百万学生与成年人,都会以响亮的“是!”来回答这些问题。而这正是 Josh McDowell 的 Evidence That Demands a Verdict 所探讨的核心。凭借在各类学生集会(从大型集会到小型沙龙、课堂讲座以及数百次咨询辅导)中的演讲经验,再加上以极优等(magna cum laude)成绩毕业于 Talbot Theological Seminary 的学术背景,以及他对基督教信仰历史证据的广泛研究——

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • 哎呀——抱歉回复晚了!对,我觉得麦道卫(Josh McDowell)写的《铁证待判》(Evidence That Demands a Verdict)非常棒。他以前是个不可知论者,一心想去证伪基督教,结果却发现其证据根本无可辩驳。我还会极力推荐的其他几本包括:《不仅仅是木匠》(More than a Carpenter)……

    Oops—sorry for the delayed response here! Yeah I think "Evidence That Demands a Verdict" by Josh McDowell is a great one. He was agnostic and set out to disprove Christianity and found its evidence was impossible to refute. Others I'd highly recommend would be: - More than a Carpenter,…

  • ……推翻支持耶稣的证据。事实上,我认为这4个人最初都是无神论者,一心想去证伪耶稣,结果得出的结论却是:支持他神性宣称的证据简直是坚不可摧!- 麦道卫的《铁证待判》(Evidence That Demands a Verdict)- 麦道卫的《不仅仅是木匠》(More than a Carpenter)- 李·斯特罗贝尔(Lee Strobel)的《重审耶稣》(The Case for Christ)- C.S. 路易斯(C.S. Lewis)的《纯粹基督教》(Mere Christianity)。最后,可能这几本书里每本都探讨了这一点,但……

    …disprove the evidence for Jesus. In fact, I believe all 4 men were atheists who set out to disprove Jesus, but came to the conclusion that the evidence supporting his claims to deity are monumental! - Evidence That Demands a Verdict, by Josh McDowell - More than a Carpenter, by Josh McDowell - The Case for Christ, by Lee Strobel - Mere Christianity, by C.S. Lewis Finally, this is addressed in probably each of these books, but…

  • 就正统基督教(非摩门教)而言,有不少著作都在为圣经文本的历史准确性作辩护。麦道卫的《铁证待判》曾是一本佳作,但现在来看几乎肯定已经过时了。J·沃纳·华莱士(J. Warner Wallace)写的《冷案基督教》(Cold Case Christianity)比较新,但内容详实度要差得多。从哲学层面来看……

    For baseline Christianity (not Mormonism), there are a number of works giving a defense of the holy texts as being historically accurate. "Evidence That Demands A Verdict" by Josh McDowell was a good one, but it is almost certainly out of date by now. "Cold Case Christianity" by J. Warner Wallace is a more recent one, but is far less comprehensive. From a philosophical…

  • ……它。他想摸得一清二楚,好在一篇批判文章里将其彻底驳倒。然而证据实在太确凿,以至于他自己反倒成了信徒。如果你或者其他人感兴趣的话,这里有一些资源:麦道卫的《铁证待判》第1卷和第2卷。第1卷里包括:- 觉得圣经和其他书没什么两样?参见第1章和第4章 - 当圣经尚未被官方接纳时,你该如何相信它……

    …it. He wanted to know it in exacting detail to totally refute it in a hit piece. But the evidence is so strong that he became a believer. If you or anyone else is interested, here are some resources Evidence That Demands a Verdict vols 1&2, Josh McDowell Included in volume 1: - think the Bible is no different from any other book? See chapters 1 and 4 - how can you trust the Bible when it wasn't officially accepted by the…

  • ……我确实信,但真要展开讲就成一篇完整的大论文了。就像你指出的那样,有成百上千的历史文献和理由构成了信仰的基石(另见麦道卫的《铁证待判》)。咱俩想的是一码事,我刚才只是在解释一件完全不同的东西。

    …I do believe, but that would have resulted in a full dissertation. As you pointed out, there are hundreds of historical texts and reasons that form the foundation for belief (see also Josh McDowell - Evidence that Demands a Verdict). We're on the same page, I was just explaining something entirely different.

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助