…这些东西依然散落在各大研究文献里。我所知道的最好尝试是 90 年代普林斯顿专题年，产出了一套绝妙的两卷本讲义《Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians》。温伯格讲 QFT 的那套三部曲也挺不错的。
…of these things is still scattered in the research literature. The best attempt that I am aware of is the special year at Princeton in the 90s it produces a fantastic two volume collection of lectures “quantum fields and strings: a course for mathematicians”. Weinberg’s three part book on QFT is also pretty nice.
…它确实要求你懂量子力学。先提醒一句，它没有那些标准教材（Polchinski 等人的书，或者加来道雄彻底放飞自我之前的作品）那么深，也不如我最喜欢的那套两卷本《Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians》，但它能让你打好基础，看懂其他的书。
…It does require you to know quantum mechanics. Mind you, it's not as deep as the standard texts (Polchinski et al. or Kaku's work prior to going off the rails) or my favourite which is the two-volume "Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians". But it makes reading the others possible.
…这些东西依然散落在各大研究文献里。我所知道的最好尝试是 90 年代普林斯顿专题年，产出了一套绝妙的两卷本讲义《Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians》。温伯格讲 QFT 的那套三部曲也挺不错的。
…of these things is still scattered in the research literature. The best attempt that I am aware of is the special year at Princeton in the 90s it produces a fantastic two volume collection of lectures “quantum fields and strings: a course for mathematicians”. Weinberg’s three part book on QFT is also pretty nice.
…它确实要求你懂量子力学。先提醒一句，它没有那些标准教材（Polchinski 等人的书，或者加来道雄彻底放飞自我之前的作品）那么深，也不如我最喜欢的那套两卷本《Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians》，但它能让你打好基础，看懂其他的书。
…It does require you to know quantum mechanics. Mind you, it's not as deep as the standard texts (Polchinski et al. or Kaku's work prior to going off the rails) or my favourite which is the two-volume "Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians". But it makes reading the others possible.