
极光
Aurora
Kim Stanley Robinson · 初版 2015 年
18人推荐
36位读者提及
40次提及
为什么值得读
- 硬核推演多代际星际飞船的生态自给自足难题
- 融入人工智能角色,并采用极具吸引力的叙事视角
- 技术细节考究,对太空生存困境刻画极为现实
“离开地球数代之后,一艘星际飞船正逐渐接近一颗可能成为船员新家园的行星。然而,漫长的旅途带来了意想不到的变故,他们最周密的计划也未必足以让他们幸存下来。”——
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……

Aurora
Kim Stanley Robinson · 初版 2015 年
“离开地球数代之后,一艘星际飞船正逐渐接近一颗可能成为船员新家园的行星。然而,漫长的旅途带来了意想不到的变故,他们最周密的计划也未必足以让他们幸存下来。”——
正在加载完整评论……
……目前还没被改编成电影或长篇剧集。Neal Stephenson 的《Anathem》非常赞,我建议你专门抽段时间彻底沉浸进去。Neal 的所有作品都很惊艳,但《Anathem》对我来说格外亮眼。Kim Stanley Robinson 的《Aurora》(极光)是我这段时间读过最喜欢的科幻小说了。世代飞船、AI,还有一个绝妙的叙事视角。我对严谨/硬核、技术细节考究的科幻完全没有抵抗力……
…to film or long form series yet. Anathem by Neal Stephenson is superb and I recommend you carve out some time to really let it soak in. Anything by Neal is phenomenal, but Anathem stands out for me. Aurora by Kim Stanley Robinson is my favorite sci-fi book I've read in a while. Generation ships, AI, and a fascinating narrative perspective. I'm a sucker for realistic/hard scifi with well-researched technical…
参见:Kim Stanley Robinson 的《Aurora》http://www.amazon.com/Aurora-Kim-Stanley-Robinson/dp/0316098...
See also: Aurora, by Kim Stanley Robinson http://www.amazon.com/Aurora-Kim-Stanley-Robinson/dp/0316098...
……睡觉时间)。我两种方式都用,综合来看我稍微更偏好自己读,但我绝不认为听书体验就低人一等。有些书会因为神级配音而大放异彩(比如 Kim Stanley Robinson 的《Aurora》),或者作者在朗读时会补充一些额外的背景信息(比如 Jim Collins 的《Good to Great》)。另外,Audible 上有海量的“Great Courses”,全是教授级的讲座。……
…bed time). I do both, and on balance I slightly prefer actually reading myself, but I don’t think of listening to a book as a lesser experience. There are books that are enhanced by a great narrator (Aurora by Kim Stanley Robinson) or the author gives a bit of extra info/context while reading (Good to Great by Jim Collins). Also, Audible has a huge selection of “Great Courses”, which are lectures from professors.…
Kim Stanley Robinson 的优秀科幻小说《Aurora》中的一个核心情节:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_(novel)
A significant part of the plot for the excellent science-fiction novel Aurora by Kim Stanley Robinson: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_(novel)
Kim Stanley Robinson 在《Aurora》[0](很棒的一本书,功课做得很足,值得一读)里的一个重要洞察是:“99.9%”的自给自足率是远远不够用的,至少对于一场跨越几代人的星际航行来说是如此。[0]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_(novel)
One of the major observations in Kim Stanley Robinson's Aurora[0] (which is excellent, well-informed, and worth a read) is that "99.9%" self-sufficient isn't going to cut it, at least for a multigenerational interstellar mission. [0]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_(novel)
关于这个点子有一本很有意思的书:Kim Stanley Robinson 的《Aurora》。
A fun book about this idea, Kim Stanley Robinson's Aurora.