性别幻觉
Delusions of gender
Cordelia Fine · 初版 2010 年
13人推荐
18位读者提及
23次提及
为什么值得读
- 揭示性别科学报道与解读中的诸多谬误
- 从统计学与神经学进行严谨剖析
- 文笔风趣生动且具备批判性视角
副标题：How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference。本书基于 neuroscience 与心理学的最新研究，批评了关于男女大脑存在先天生理差异的论调，指责其存在缺陷且被夸大，并探讨了文化和社会观念是如何导致性别差异的。Cornelia Fine 是一名学院派心理学家。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
不管是哪位想批判性地审视这类“心理学结果”，我都强烈推荐去了解一下科迪莉亚·法恩（Cordelia Fine，牛津、剑桥、UCL 背景）和她的《性别的迷思》（Delusions of Gender）。听她的演讲或看她的书很有意思，她非常透彻地指出了“性别科学”在科研、报道以及解读上的漏洞，从统计学层面一直剖析到神经学层面。http://blip.tv/slowtv/delusions-of-gender-p1-cordelia-fine-4...…
Whomever wants a critical look at this kind of "psychology result", I really recommend checking out Cordelia Fine (Oxford, Cambridge, UCL educated) and "Delusions of Gender". She is a fun listen/read and explains really well the flaws in the science/reporting/interpretation of "gender science", from the statistical to the neurological. http://blip.tv/slowtv/delusions-of-gender-p1-cordelia-fine-4...…
……得出了与詹姆斯·达莫尔（James Damore）相似的结论：http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/13/opinions/williams-ceci-women-i... 我们至少把那些能对现存临床观点提出质疑的田野调查/研究摆出来吧。比如科迪莉亚·法恩的《性别的迷思：性别差异背后的真实科学》（Delusions of Gender: The Real Science Behind Sex Differences），至少是对潜在漏洞做出了严谨的批判。让这种对话代表普通工程师的观点，属实有点令人唏嘘。
…similar conclusion to James Damore: http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/13/opinions/williams-ceci-women-i... Let's at least present the field studies/research, which can throw existing clinical views into doubt. eg Delusions of Gender: The Real Science Behind Sex Differences by Cordelia Fine is at least a rigorous critique of possible flaws. It's a little saddening, to have this dialog represent the views of an average engineer.
……推崇这些社会保守主义观点的人喜欢给它们裹上一层伪科学的外衣，他们宣称 Tinder 强化了“古老的”行为模式。（关于伪科学这部分非常好的资料来源：科迪莉亚·法恩博士的《性别的迷思》。还有很多其他的。虽然我知道伪科学这部分在座的某些人可能觉得有争议，但我希望至少“UI 能引导用户行为”这个观点大家是没有异议的。）
…the people who promote these socially conservative ideas like to wrap them in a veneer of pseudoscience, they claim that Tinder reinforces “ancient” behavior. (Great source on the pseudoscience part: “Delusions of Gender” by Dr. Cordelia Fine. Plenty of others exist. And while I know the pseudoscience part might be controversial to some on here, I hope at least the idea that user interfaces guide user behavior is not.)
请读读科迪莉亚·法恩的《性别的迷思》，因为它恰恰深入剖析了为什么这类东西完全是伪科学。
Please read Cordelia Fine's Delusions of Gender, because it goes into exactly why things like this are bogus science.
见我的另一条评论——另外，也可以看看科迪莉亚·法恩的《性别的迷思》，以及艾米丽·凯恩（Emily Kane）的《性别陷阱》（The Gender Trap）
See my other comment -- also, see the book Delusions of Gender by Cordelia Fine, and The Gender Trap by Emily Kane
……过去 20 年间关于性别的新思想、新理论和新研究的源泉，包括： 坎迪斯·韦斯特（Candace West）与唐·H·齐默尔曼（Don H. Zimmerman）的《做性别》（Doing Gender）- http://blog.lib.umn.edu/clar0514/academic/west%20and%20zimme... 科迪莉亚·法恩的《性别的迷思》- http://www.cordeliafine.com/delusions_of_gender.html 艾米丽·凯恩的《性别陷阱》- http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0095VEM5O/ref=cm_cr_thx_vi...
…wellspring of new thought, theory, and research in the past 20 years on gender, including: Doing Gender - Candace West; Don H. Zimmerman - http://blog.lib.umn.edu/clar0514/academic/west%20and%20zimme... Delusions of Gender by Cordelia Fine - http://www.cordeliafine.com/delusions_of_gender.html The Gender Trap by Emily Kane - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0095VEM5O/ref=cm_cr_thx_vi...