逻辑学
The science of logic
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel · 初版 1812 年
3人推荐
12位读者提及
14次提及
为什么值得读
- 被范畴论先驱借鉴并产出优质数学成果
- 理解现代西方哲学与认识论不可绕过的源头
- 二十世纪诸多逻辑学著作皆受其启发与回应
“Cambridge Hegel Translations 旨在以适合黑格尔学者的统一格式，提供 Hegel 著作的最佳现代德语版本的翻译，并附带哲学导论和完整的编辑注释。这部由 G.W.F. Hegel 著述的 The Science of Logic（亦称 Greater Logic）的新译本包括了修订后的第一册（1832年）、第二册（1813年）和第三册（1816年）。近期的研究为我们详细勾勒了促使 Hegel 形成其哲学体系最终构想的过程，以及 Logic 在其中的地位。我们现在得以理
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
你可以试试现代逻辑学的 OG 之作——20世纪所有关于逻辑的论著都在回应它——那就是黑格尔的《逻辑学》（Science of Logic）。不过它跟你预想中的逻辑学教材可能大相径庭。
You could try the OG book of modern logic, to which all 20th century tracts on logic are responses to, Hegel's Science of Logic. Though its very different from what you might expect out of a logic text.
Bill Lawvere 这位极具原创思想的范畴论和逻辑学先驱，曾认为黑格尔非常值得研究，并从《逻辑学》（Science of Logic）中发展出了极其漂亮的数学 [1]。说实话，如果你认定黑格尔或马克思毫无可读之处，那你简直就是井底之蛙。[1] https://github.com/mattearnshaw/lawvere/blob/master/pdfs/199...
Bill Lawvere, an extraordinarily original thinker and pioneer of category theory and logic has thought Hegel worth studying and has produced very nice mathematics out of the Science of Logic [1]. Honestly if you've made up your mind that there's nothing worth reading in Hegel or Marx you're like a frog at the bottom of a well. [1] https://github.com/mattearnshaw/lawvere/blob/master/pdfs/199...
如果你是靠阅读来学习，那就读原著一手文献吧：普罗泰戈拉、柏拉图、亚里士多德、笛卡尔、休谟、康德、黑格尔（特别是《逻辑学》Science of Logic），按这个顺序读，基本就能帮你跟上现代哲学的脉络了。话说普罗泰戈拉的一手文献能看啥？他的著作好像都没流传下来吧。
If you learn by reading, read primary sources: Protagoras, Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Hume, Kant, Hegel (the Science of Logic in particular), in that order, are basically what you need to get caught up to modernity in philosophy. What would be a primary source for Protagoras? It appears none of his works are extant.
……一个“整体”本身由许多整体构成，并且进一步参与到一个更大的“整体”中。你一定会爱上哲学的！！黑格尔的《逻辑学》（Science of Logic）对这一点做出了最权威、最科学的阐述，但那可以说是超级高阶的顶级哲学了，所以你可能不会想从那儿开始哈哈。不管怎样祝你好运，我完全同意你的总体论点！欣慰的是，一般来说……
…a "whole" in its own is composed of many wholes themselves, and goes on to partake in a bigger "whole". You’re gonna love philosophy!! This is covered most definitively and scientifically by Hegel’s Science of Logic, but that’s like super advanced high level philosophy so you might not want to start there lol. Either way best of luck, I totally agree with your general thesis! You’ll be happy to know that, in general,…
……我们作为观察者的计算有限性与宇宙中底层过程的计算不可约性之间的相互作用。他的重大洞见实际上就是黑格尔《The Science of Logic》的起点，即我们是有限的。这丝毫不能证明其他那些东西（尤其是多重宇宙理论）是合理的，也完全不足以构建一个有意义且有用的时间概念。它只能给你……
…interplay between our computational boundedness as observers, and the computational irreducibility of underlying processes in the universe. His big insight is literally the starting point of Hegel’s The Science of Logic, namely that we are finite. That in no ways justifies all the other stuff (especially multiverse theory), and it’s not enough to build a meaningfully useful conception of time, at all. All it gets you…
……哲学：https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_C._Beiser#Works 另外，从黑格尔的讲演录（关于美学、历史、宗教等）入手要容易得多，等对他的风格和总体哲学有了感觉后，再去读《精神现象学》（Phenomenology）和《逻辑学》（Science of Logic）。一上来就啃最难的文本是愚蠢的。还有，别把叔本华对黑格尔的批判太当回事，那大多是因为……
…philosophy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_C._Beiser#Works Also, it's much easier to start with Hegel's lectures (on aesthetics, history, religion etc.) and just go read the Phenomenology & Science of Logic after one has a sense of his style and general philosophy. It's foolish to start by the most difficult texts. And don't take Schopenhauer's criticisms of Hegel too seriously, as they are mostly due to…