词与物
The order of things
Michel Foucault · 初版 1966 年
4人推荐
11位读者提及
13次提及
为什么值得读
- 深入剖析了文化与时代如何塑造并限制我们的视界
- 书中关于“交换”等章节对经济学视角有独到见解
- 鼓励读者以开放心态反思现代社会隐含的基本假设
当人们将“秩序”定义为优先事项的排序时，福柯在此所做之事就变得清晰明了。他以大师级的表演技巧，编织了一部极其复杂的思想史。在《词与物》中，他涉猎文学、艺术、经济学甚至生物学，这可能是二十世纪最重要却最被忽视的著作之一。尽管后来关于权力和话语的著作使其黯然失色，但正是《词与物》确立了福柯作为思想巨人的声誉。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……就像在所谓的水里游动的一条鱼那样，然后说“没错，但我们的假设这次是真的站得住脚”。如果你对这套东西感兴趣而且还没读过，我推荐 Michel Foucault 的《The Order of Things》。关于他的学术水平存在一些质疑（他引用的所有文献真的表达了他声称的那些意思吗？？），但如果你带着开放的心态去读他的著作，我想你会赞同这类……
…that, as a fish swimming in the proverbial water, and say “yes, but our assumptions are actually true for real this time.” If you’re interested in this stuff and haven’t read it already I’d recommend The Order of Things by Michel Foucault. There are questions about his scholarship (do all the sources he cites say the things he says they say??) but if you read his work with an open mind, I think you’d agree those kind…
Marcus Aurelius 的《Meditations》——极其通俗浅显地解释了生活中真正重要的事情。Michel Foucault 的《The Order of Things》或《Madness and Civilisation》——审视了我们的文化与时代如何限制了我们世界观的视野。Tolstoy 的《Anna Karenina》——发生在 19 世纪俄罗斯的一套错综复杂的爱情故事……
Meditations by Marcus Aurelius - a wonderfully simple explanation of what is truly important in life. The Order of Things or Madness and Civilisation by Michel Foucault - a look at how our culture and time limit the horizons of our world view. Anna Karenina by Tolstoy - a complicated set of love stories set in 19C Russia…
（你的回复让我想到了另一本我本该提起的书——Michel Foucault 的《The Order of Things》（Les Mots et Les Choses）。）如果哲学是探究人类境况的冲动，那我认为任何哲学家都不能也不应该忽视《圣经》。雅典、罗马和耶路撒冷是……
(Your reply brings to mind another book I should have mentioned - The Order of Things (Les Mots et Les Choses) by Michel Foucault.) If philosophy is the drive to understand the human condition, I don't think any philosopher can or should ignore the Bible. Athens, Rome and Jerusalem are…
……关于这个等式是如何自我修正的，你有什么推荐了解更多的地方吗？另外，如果不选 Foucault，在“经济学见解”方面你会推荐谁？Foucault 在《The Order of Things》里关于“交换”的几个章节相当深刻，如果你读了之后有任何具体的批评或不同意见，我非常乐意拜读。
…you have any suggestions on where to learn more about how this equation self-rectifies? Also, if not Foucault, who would you recommend for "economic insight?" Foucault's chapters on "Exchange" in "The Order of Things" are quite insightful, and if you read them and have any particular criticisms or disagreements I would much enjoy reading them.
……登上首页的那些内容类型，以及评论区往往比原文挖得更深。在这个帖子下面甚至有一个子楼，大家居然聊起了 Foucault 的《The Order of Things》。对于一篇幼稚的通俗哲学文章的评论区来说，这水平相当可以了。
…kinds of things that make it to the front page, and by how the comments often go deeper than the original article. There was even a sub-thread on this thread where people were bringing up Foucault's The Order of Things. Not bad for comments on a piece of naive pop-philosophy.
……那个，因为我们并不经常拿城堡来做交易，但我们经常拿货币换面包、糊口口粮以及日用商品。我认为去读读 Foucault 的《The Order of Things》会大有裨益，书中解释了只有当出现超出本地生活必需的剩余时，贸易才可能发生，而正是这种剩余催生了货币。
…that, because we are not frequently trading castles, but we are frequently trading currency for bread and for sustenance and commodity-goods. I think one would benefit from reading Foucault's "The Order of Things" which explains that trade can only happen when there is a surplus beyond what is locally necessary, and this surplus is what gives rise to currency.