
OCaml 实战
Real World OCaml
Yaron Minsky、Anil Madhavapeddy、Jason Hickey · 初版 2013 年
69人推荐
98位读者提及
141次提及
为什么值得读
- 结合Jane Street工程库讲透实用类型系统
- 深入涉及OCaml底层实现细节与语言机制
- 展现函数式特性在现代软件工程中的强大表达力
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……

Real World OCaml
Yaron Minsky、Anil Madhavapeddy、Jason Hickey · 初版 2013 年
正在加载完整评论……
……巨大的优势。我肯定是有偏见的,因为我的核心技能是 Python,所以相比 Haskell 或 Scala 用户,对我来说学一门新语言的阻力小不小才是更重要的。Yaron Minsky 网站上的《Real World OCaml》第二版对我来说是非常棒的资源,不过等多核(multicore)真正稳定并全面启用之后,肯定还有更多东西要学。拥抱类型系统能带来如此……真的是个很棒的转变
…huge asset. I'm surely biased, my main skillset is in Python so of course the low friction to a new language is more important to me rather than say, a Haskell user, or a Scala user. The 2nd edition of Real World Ocaml on Yaron Minsky's site is a great resource for me, though once multicore is actually stable and fully activated there will be still more learning to do. It's a really nice change to embrace types so…
读作者的对比时,我也想到了 OCaml。读了 Minsky 的博文和《Real World OCaml》这本书后,我深深被它在现代软件开发中的实力吸引了。关于它的面向对象特性我听过褒贬不一的评价,但它的函数式特性绝对扎实、富有表现力且易于……
As I read the author's comparison, OCaml came to my mind as well. Reading Minsky's posts and the Real World OCaml book got me really interested in its capabilities for modern software development. I've heard mixed reviews about the object-oriented features, but the functional ones are solid, expressive, and easy…
……让你充满信心地去死磕更大、更棘手的问题,或许还能找回写代码的乐趣。OCaml、Reason 和 BuckleScript 都是非常棒的切入点——社区氛围好,而且很包容。《Real World OCaml》(Minsky、Madhavapeddy 和 Hickey 著)是一本见解非常深刻的佳作。你也可以直接上 Haskell,但它在 Web 浏览器端的表现不如 OCaml(多亏了 BuckleScript)。或者也可以看看 PureScript……
…make you confident to tackle larger and harder problems and maybe bring the fun back into programming. OCaml and Reason and BuckleScript is a great starting point - the community is nice and welcoming. Real World OCaml by Minsky, Madhavapeddy, and Hickey is a text with a lot of insights. You can also go straight to Haskell, but its web-browser story is not as good as OCaml's (thanks to BuckleScript). Or there is PureScript…
除了和 Jane Street 的库深度绑定之外,《Real World OCaml》更“深入”,因为它还讲了底层实现细节。而这本书则更偏向“通过 OCaml 入门函数式编程”的感觉。两本都是好教材,只是侧重点不同。主要的……
Apart from being tied with Jane Street's libraries, Real World OCaml is "deeper" in that it also talks about implementation details. This book has a more "introduction to functional programming via OCaml" vibe. Both are good textbooks with different emphases. The main…
哇,前 5 条评论都是关于他们是否应该使用 LLVM 的 :) 作者目前正在写一本关于 OCaml 的书,现在可以从这里获得 alpha 版本:http://www.realworldocaml.org/ 我已经完成了第一部分并看了编译器部分,我喜欢这本书,没有任何利益关联。
Wow, the first 5 comments on this were about should they use LLVM:) The author is currently writing a book about OCaml that is now available in alpha format from here: http://www.realworldocaml.org/ I've finished the first part and looked at the compiler section, and I love this book, no affiliation in any way.
《Real World OCaml》确实神作——虽说网上能免费看,但如果你发现自己真的从中受益良多,请至少买一本电子书支持一下。绝对物超所值。(利益无关,纯 OCaml 业余爱好者……
Real World OCaml is indeed awesome -- while it is free, if you do find yourself making good use of it, please also at least buy an ebook version. Totally worth its bytes in gold. (No affiliation, just an OCaml dilettante…