如果你能搞到一本的话，我推荐 Thouless 写的（老）书《Straight and Crooked Thinking》。它梳理了一系列“不诚实”的辩论技巧（不一定依赖逻辑谬误），以及化解这些套路的方法。
I recommend an (old) book by Thouless called "Straight and Crooked Thinking" if you can get your hands on a copy. It goes through a list of "dishonest" debate techniques (not necessarily relying on fallacies) and possible techniques to disarm them.
如果你能搞到，我强烈推荐一本（Robert?）Thouless 写的旧书《Straight and crooked thinking》，它指出了几种常见的不真诚论辩手法的形式，揭示了其中所使用的逻辑谬误或不道德的修辞伎俩，并给出了如何反驳它们（或者至少……）的建议。
If you can get your hands on it, I highly recommend an old book by (Robert?) Thouless called: "Straight and crooked thinking", which identifies the form of several common disingenuous argumentation techniques, brings out the fallacy or dishonest rhetorical device employed, and suggestions on how to counter them (or at least…
我找到的最好的资源是一本很棒的老书——《Straight and Crooked Thinking》[1] [1] http://www.neglectedbooks.com/Straight_and_Crooked_Thinking....
The best resource I have found is a fantastic old book - Straight and Crooked Thinking[1] [1] http://www.neglectedbooks.com/Straight_and_Crooked_Thinking....
我不确定我们是否总是在追求“作品”。有时候同一部作品的不同“表达形式”差异非常大，以至于它们的价值也不尽相同。例如，对比一下《Straight and crooked thinking》的最新版和 1930 年出版的那一版。
I'm not sure we always want 'works'. Sometimes different 'expressions' of the same work are different enough that they don't have the same value. For example, compare the most recent edition of 'Straight and crooked thinking' with the one published in 1930.
如果你能搞到一本的话，我推荐 Thouless 写的（老）书《Straight and Crooked Thinking》。它梳理了一系列“不诚实”的辩论技巧（不一定依赖逻辑谬误），以及化解这些套路的方法。
I recommend an (old) book by Thouless called "Straight and Crooked Thinking" if you can get your hands on a copy. It goes through a list of "dishonest" debate techniques (not necessarily relying on fallacies) and possible techniques to disarm them.
去看看 Robert Thouless 写的《Straight and crooked thinking》。http://www.amazon.com/dp/1444117181
Check out 'Straight and crooked thinking' by Robert Thouless. http://www.amazon.com/dp/1444117181
如果你能搞到，我强烈推荐一本（Robert?）Thouless 写的旧书《Straight and crooked thinking》，它指出了几种常见的不真诚论辩手法的形式，揭示了其中所使用的逻辑谬误或不道德的修辞伎俩，并给出了如何反驳它们（或者至少……）的建议。
If you can get your hands on it, I highly recommend an old book by (Robert?) Thouless called: "Straight and crooked thinking", which identifies the form of several common disingenuous argumentation techniques, brings out the fallacy or dishonest rhetorical device employed, and suggestions on how to counter them (or at least…
我找到的最好的资源是一本很棒的老书——《Straight and Crooked Thinking》[1] [1] http://www.neglectedbooks.com/Straight_and_Crooked_Thinking....
The best resource I have found is a fantastic old book - Straight and Crooked Thinking[1] [1] http://www.neglectedbooks.com/Straight_and_Crooked_Thinking....
这是 Wikipedia 页面上链接的 PDF 版本：http://neglectedbooks.com/Straight_and_Crooked_Thinking.pdf
Here is the PDF version linked on the Wikipedia page: http://neglectedbooks.com/Straight_and_Crooked_Thinking.pdf
我不确定我们是否总是在追求“作品”。有时候同一部作品的不同“表达形式”差异非常大，以至于它们的价值也不尽相同。例如，对比一下《Straight and crooked thinking》的最新版和 1930 年出版的那一版。
I'm not sure we always want 'works'. Sometimes different 'expressions' of the same work are different enough that they don't have the same value. For example, compare the most recent edition of 'Straight and crooked thinking' with the one published in 1930.