国家为什么会失败
Why Nations Fail
Daron Acemoglu、James A. Robinson · 初版 2012 年
74人推荐
117位读者提及
146次提及
为什么值得读
- 剖析包容性制度对商业创新的激励
- 揭示汲取性政策导致国家贫困的机制
- 尝试解答对外援助为何难以奏效的难题
为什么有些国家富足而另一些国家贫困，深陷财富与匮乏、健康与疾疫、丰足与饥馑的巨大鸿沟？繁荣或贫困究竟是由文化、气候还是地理条件决定的？正如 Why Nations Fail 所揭示的那样，这些因素无一具有决定性，更非宿命。基于长达十五年的原创性研究，Daron Acemoglu 和 James Robinson 令人信服地证明，人造的政治与经济制度才是决定经济成败（抑或衰落）的根本底色。仅以同宗同源、高度同质化的朝鲜半岛为例，北朝鲜民众却身处世界上最……
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
《国家为什么会失败》（神作！）《黑猩猩的政治》（有趣）《公司绝密》（有点被害妄想，但值得一读）《开发者霸权》（开发者的红药丸！！！）《谈判优势》（很合理）Tempo: Timing，……
Why Nations Fail (amazing!) Chimpanzee Politics (interesting) Corporate Confidential (paranoid, but worth a read) Developer Hegemony (red pill for developers!!!) Bargaining For Advantage (reasonable) Tempo: Timing,…
……给各个发展中国家送去了万亿（带“万”的）美元。但收效甚微。为什么？这是许多书试图回答的问题（好奇的话我推荐《死援》、《底层十亿人》和《国家为什么会失败》）。我觉得我们永远得不到一个完整的答案，但至少应该提出正确的问题。（顺带提一句：我是非营利组织和公共机构的筹款申请书撰写顾问。……
…trillion (with a "t") dollars to various developing countries. It hasn't done much. Why not? That's a question that a host of books have attempted to answer (I recommend Dead Aid, The Bottom Billion, and Why Nations Fail to the curious). I don't think we'll ever get a complete answer but we should at least be asking the right questions. (Relevant observation: I'm a grant writing consultant for nonprofit and public agencies.…
读完《枪炮、病菌与钢铁》后应该立刻读的书是 Daron Acemoglu 的《国家为什么会失败》。另外了解这一点也挺有用：戴蒙德并没有地理学学位，很多地理学家并不是特别赞同他的观点。我看他就像看 Malcolm……
A book to read immediately after Guns Germs and Steel is Why Nations Fail by Daron Acemoglu. It's also useful to know that Diamond does not have a degree in Geography and many geographers aren't particularly on board with his ideas. I think of him the same way I do Malcom…
关于这点有一本好书叫《国家为什么会失败》（Why Nations Fail）[1]，他们认为掠夺性经济政策（腐败政府）本质上是在遏制创业型企业的发展，而包容性政策则能让它们蓬勃发展。他们用这个论点……
There's a good book on this called "Why Nations Fail," [1] they posit that extractive economic policies (corrupted governments) essentially de-incentivize entrepreneurial businesses, while inclusive policies cause them to thrive. They use this argument…
一件好事，因为公平竞争方式是美国过去200多年来处于世界主导地位的唯一差异化政策。参见 Acemoglu 和 Robinson 合著的《国家为什么会失败》。
A good thing, since fair methods of competition is the single differentiating policy of the USA that put it into a dominant world position over the last 200+ years. See Why Nations Fail by Acemoglu and Robinson.
……你这简直是‘何不食肉糜’。大多数经济学家都不会同意。更多的经济和政治自由会加速经济进步，而不是阻碍它。去看看 Daron Acemoglu 的《国家为什么会失败》吧，里面对结合中国情况的讨论非常深入。
…You're telling me to eat cake since we ran out of bread The majority of economists would disagree. More economic and political freedom would accelerate economic progress, not hold it back. Check out Why Nations Fail by Daron Acemoglu for an in depth discussion of this in relation to China.