我经常推荐《民主的模式》（Patterns of Democracy），但系统似乎压根没收录它，尽管它显然连只被提过一次的书都会抓取。
I’ve frequently suggested Patterns of Democracy and it doesn't seem to have picked it up, despite apparently picking up books with only a single mention.
……代表制中比例性更高的体系，公众对地方政府运作状况的评价往往也更高，这大概不是巧合；想看优秀的综合概述，可以参考利普哈特（Lijphart）的《民主的模式》（Patterns of Democracy）。
…greater proportionality in representation also tend to have higher public opinion of how well the local government works, which is probably not coincidental; for a good general survey, see Lijphart's Patterns of Democracy.
……代表名额的分配与人口不成比例（参议院显然如此，但颗粒度问题也导致众议院各选区的人口规模存在显著差异）。阿伦德·利普哈特的《民主的模式》（Patterns of Democracy）非常全面地探讨了各个现代民主国家拥有代议制政府的程度、与有效代表相关的结构特征，以及……
…distribution of representation disproportionately to population (obviously in the Senate, but granularity results in significant variance in district size for House seats, as well.) Arend Lijphart's Patterns of Democracy provides pretty good coverage of both the degree to which various modern democracies have representative government, the structural features that are associated with effective representation, and the…
……非比例代表制的方法，所以这仍然是个悬而未决的问题。各国政府满意度的实际比较确实存在，并表明结果的比例性是关键。参见，例如，Lijphart 的《民主的模式》（Patterns of Democracy）。缺少那种有缺陷、有局限、忽略现实世界关键特征的抽象数学比较，并不算什么大问题。> 而且你可能得采用评分投票或认可投票……
…non-PR methods, so it's still very much an open question. Comparisons in actual government satisfaction between countries do exist and show that proportionality of outcomes is key. See, e.g., Lijphart’s Patterns of Democracy. The absence of flawed, limited, abstract mathematical comparisons that ignore key features of the real world is not particularly a problem. > And you may have to get Score Voting or Approval Voting…
……多党制，它也是那种经验上在代表性无效和政府不满方面问题几乎和美国一样严重的成熟民主国家（参见 Arend Lijphart 的《民主的模式》（Patterns of Democracy）），所以虽然它成功掩盖了党派双头垄断的症状，实际上并没有解决代表性问题。> 而我们有些人确实亲身经历过那种选举过程和政治……
…multiple parties, it's also the established democracy that has empirically nearly as bad a problem with ineffective representation and dissatisfaction with government as the US (see, Arend Lijphart’s Patterns of Democracy), so while it manages to paper over the partisan duopoly symptom, it doesn't actually deal with the representational problem. > And some of us have actually lived under the electoral process and politics…
我经常推荐《民主的模式》（Patterns of Democracy），但系统似乎压根没收录它，尽管它显然连只被提过一次的书都会抓取。
I’ve frequently suggested Patterns of Democracy and it doesn't seem to have picked it up, despite apparently picking up books with only a single mention.
……代表制中比例性更高的体系，公众对地方政府运作状况的评价往往也更高，这大概不是巧合；想看优秀的综合概述，可以参考利普哈特（Lijphart）的《民主的模式》（Patterns of Democracy）。
…greater proportionality in representation also tend to have higher public opinion of how well the local government works, which is probably not coincidental; for a good general survey, see Lijphart's Patterns of Democracy.
……代表名额的分配与人口不成比例（参议院显然如此，但颗粒度问题也导致众议院各选区的人口规模存在显著差异）。阿伦德·利普哈特的《民主的模式》（Patterns of Democracy）非常全面地探讨了各个现代民主国家拥有代议制政府的程度、与有效代表相关的结构特征，以及……
…distribution of representation disproportionately to population (obviously in the Senate, but granularity results in significant variance in district size for House seats, as well.) Arend Lijphart's Patterns of Democracy provides pretty good coverage of both the degree to which various modern democracies have representative government, the structural features that are associated with effective representation, and the…
与其他老牌民主国家相比。表面上可能不容易看出来，我还是建议你参考利普哈特的《民主的模式》（Patterns of Democracy）。
Compared with other established democracies. It may not be easy to see superficially, again, if refer you to Lijphart's Patterns of Democracy.
……非比例代表制的方法，所以这仍然是个悬而未决的问题。各国政府满意度的实际比较确实存在，并表明结果的比例性是关键。参见，例如，Lijphart 的《民主的模式》（Patterns of Democracy）。缺少那种有缺陷、有局限、忽略现实世界关键特征的抽象数学比较，并不算什么大问题。> 而且你可能得采用评分投票或认可投票……
…non-PR methods, so it's still very much an open question. Comparisons in actual government satisfaction between countries do exist and show that proportionality of outcomes is key. See, e.g., Lijphart’s Patterns of Democracy. The absence of flawed, limited, abstract mathematical comparisons that ignore key features of the real world is not particularly a problem. > And you may have to get Score Voting or Approval Voting…
……多党制，它也是那种经验上在代表性无效和政府不满方面问题几乎和美国一样严重的成熟民主国家（参见 Arend Lijphart 的《民主的模式》（Patterns of Democracy）），所以虽然它成功掩盖了党派双头垄断的症状，实际上并没有解决代表性问题。> 而我们有些人确实亲身经历过那种选举过程和政治……
…multiple parties, it's also the established democracy that has empirically nearly as bad a problem with ineffective representation and dissatisfaction with government as the US (see, Arend Lijphart’s Patterns of Democracy), so while it manages to paper over the partisan duopoly symptom, it doesn't actually deal with the representational problem. > And some of us have actually lived under the electoral process and politics…